sirjofri writes:
> 06.03.2024 11:36:39 Edouard Klein :
>
...
>>
>> I'll try to compile it on Linux and will let you know :)
>
> Well, it's designed for plan 9 systems, so you're probably out of luck on
> linux, except you try it with plan9ports.
>
That was the plan.
> While we're talking abo
06.03.2024 11:36:39 Edouard Klein :
>
> sirjofri writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 05.03.2024 22:38:59 Edouard Klein :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your answer.
>>>
>>>
>>> sirjofri writes:
>>>
Hello,
I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/machinename/service
instead.
a...@9srv.net writes:
> I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a finger
> server they wrote. :-) My tcp79 comes from my implementation, here:
> http://txtpunk.com/finger/index.html
>
> I think we've got enough interoperable unicode-aware implementations we can
> s
hiro <23h...@gmail.com> writes:
> all this makes sense. thank you.
> i might be dense, but what's the problem with inetd exactly?
>
I have two main gripes with it:
- it runs as root, in order to switch users when launching a server, and
therefore is a security risk.
- it can be configured only
a...@9srv.net writes:
> I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a finger
> server they wrote. :-)
Indeed, it may be why I can't seem to find a good, standard
implementation: there are as many implementations as servers.
> My tcp79 comes from my implementation, here
sirjofri writes:
> Hi,
>
> 05.03.2024 22:38:59 Edouard Klein :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for your answer.
>>
>>
>> sirjofri writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/machinename/service
>>> instead. My contents are copies of what's in /rc/bin/service or
all this makes sense. thank you.
i might be dense, but what's the problem with inetd exactly?
On 3/5/24, a...@9srv.net wrote:
> I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a
> finger server they wrote. :-) My tcp79 comes from my implementation,
> here: http://txtpunk.com/
I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a finger
server they wrote. :-) My tcp79 comes from my implementation, here:
http://txtpunk.com/finger/index.html
I think we've got enough interoperable unicode-aware implementations we can
start working on the update to the R
Hi,
05.03.2024 22:38:59 Edouard Klein :
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
>
> sirjofri writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/machinename/service
>> instead. My contents are copies of what's in /rc/bin/service or my own
>> scripts:
>
> I assume that
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
sirjofri writes:
> Hello,
>
> I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/machinename/service
> instead. My contents are copies of what's in /rc/bin/service or my own
> scripts:
I assume that you then bind-mount /cfg/machinename/service to that
machine
Hello,
I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/machinename/service
instead. My contents are copies of what's in /rc/bin/service or my own scripts:
tcp80 - web server
tcp443 - web server but wrapped in tls
...
I have some cifd running, some irc server that translates to grid chat, my
Dear 9fans,
Those of you who run a Plan 9 or Inferno box, could you please share the
contents of your /rc/bin/service or /dis/svc dir ?
I'm writing about Plan 9's listen, and I've read the scripts included in
the default distribution (e.g.
http://git.9front.org/plan9front/plan9front/c5c19dfe4998f
12 matches
Mail list logo
