This one might be adapted to work for gitlabs. It only supports read only type
commands: clone, checkout, pull.
http://9legacy.org/9legacy/tools/git
It could be a start.
Chris
> On Nov 21, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Wes Kussmaul wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/21/2016 03:46 AM, Sigrid Haflinadóttir wrote:
>
On 11/21/2016 03:46 AM, Sigrid Haflinadóttir wrote:
Very kind! Where can I download your Plan 9 git client?
I'm afraid mine is something of a "stone soup" offering. Perhaps someone
can add value to the soup by providing a client.
--
Wes Kussmaul
The Authenticity Institute
738 Main
How do I register on GitLab though? It tries to show me a captcha, but it
seems mothra doesn't support it! What do I do???
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:19:13PM -0500, Wes Kussmaul wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/19/2016 05:27 PM, David Arnold wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:19:13PM -0500, Wes Kussmaul wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/2016 05:27 PM, David Arnold wrote:
> > On 17 Nov 2016, at 12:18, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:55:38PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
> >
> >>> Also does anyone want to host the source tree in a reposito
i give up. muted.
On 11/19/2016 05:27 PM, David Arnold wrote:
On 17 Nov 2016, at 12:18, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:55:38PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
Also does anyone want to host the source tree in a repository?
This sounds like a lot of work. Who would undertake this??
GitHub, GitLa
you have to be careful with these feature requests, some don't really
bring plan 9 forward, because they are too generally useful and not
plan 9 specific enough.
On 11/20/16, Chris McGee wrote:
> I like the idea of focusing on the functionality, not specific software,
> that could go into a 5th e
I like the idea of focusing on the functionality, not specific software, that
could go into a 5th edition. It seems that stepping back and rethinking popular
industry trends led to some of the unique and interesting decisions that gave
us plan9 in the first place.
Here is what I'd like to see
-
On 11/20/16, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> ...which got shut down earlier this year:
That's a lie, nothing has been shut down. Google loves us too much.
Plan 9 is not dead either.
http://r-36.net/9front/9front-5561.df1dc1ff2475.iso.bz2.torrent
9fans - best served dry.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 10:26:36PM -0600, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> ...which got shut down earlier this year:
>
> https://opensource.googleblog.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html?m=1
>
This must have come to a shock to their users! I wonder what they did
...which got shut down earlier this year:
https://opensource.googleblog.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html?m=1
--
Ryan (ライアン)
Yoko Shimomura > ryo (supercell/EGOIST) > Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone else
http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
On Nov 19, 2016 8:41 PM, "hiro" <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
i have heard good things about google code
http://fqa.9front.org/fqa0.html#0.2.3
sl
On 17 Nov 2016, at 12:18, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:55:38PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
>> Also does anyone want to host the source tree in a repository?
>
> This sounds like a lot of work. Who would undertake this??
GitHub, GitLab, or BitBucket all provide gratis repository
Almost all of the original plan9 team work for google now.
some of them work on Go, a language which has shared ancestry with alef and
limbo.
there are not maintainers as such, though some people do maintenance and some
still develop new features and ports.
plan9 is ad hoc.
i still think it'
Any features that should be incorporated into Plan 9?
Also, where are the developers? Do they still maintain it? If not, I guess
we assume the role of maintainers...
On Nov 16, 2016 17:27, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>
> My desires:
> ISO-compliant C compiler and pre
Add one more: XHCI (USB 3.0) support, because the USB device driver
currently does not support it, as stated in the USB man page in section 3
On Nov 16, 2016 17:27, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>
> My desires:
> ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor
> Port other p
Cinap,
I salute you and the good sense you write.
-Steve
> On 19 Nov 2016, at 16:57, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
>
> calling into firmware code is a big can of worms because firmware is full
> of bugs and only works with a small set of the major operating systems that
> the firmware auth
calling into firmware code is a big can of worms because firmware is full
of bugs and only works with a small set of the major operating systems that
the firmware authors tested it with.
and theres not really an option for doing it from userspace.
you need to call it from kernel mode ring zero an
btw. the turing machine should work in user space of course. why would
anyone put that into a kernel?!
for 5th edition i wanna see a turing machine where the tape is
exported through a file server, it should support jumping to arbitrary
times via a ctl file. that way we can solve complex problems very
easily from simple rc scripts. for example: echo inf >
turing/time/ctl; cat turing/tape
On 11/18/1
9p @ boot is what I made for bootloader. BIOS, PXE, MBR. Not much of a
kernel is needed as one can flash "the" program for cluster nodes.
On Nov 18, 2016 11:57 AM, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all EFI variables.
As for the bootloader, any ideas?
On W
My mistake for hastiness: should we implement the filesystem in kernel or
user space?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Charlie Lin wrote:
> Like efivarfs in the Linux kernel
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Charlie Lin
> wrote:
>
>> My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all E
Like efivarfs in the Linux kernel
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Charlie Lin wrote:
> My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all EFI variables.
> As for the bootloader, any ideas?
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:21:14PM -0
My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all EFI variables.
As for the bootloader, any ideas?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
> > Add one more: EFI support
> > Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmw
Plan9 doesn't use make. It has a mkfile as well.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:29:58 -0500, Chris McGee wrote:
> It doesn't build for me anymore. Fixing the make file seemed non trivial.
>
> Chris
>
> > On Nov 17, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Ori Bernstein wrote:
> >
> > https://bitbucket.org/oridb/libgit2
>
There's also Gogits.
https://github.com/gogits/git
I haven't tried it yet.
Chris
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Dave MacFarlane wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Chris McGee wrote:
>> For git, there's a wrapper script for github and others. But yes, a fuller
>> featured git would
It doesn't build for me anymore. Fixing the make file seemed non trivial.
Chris
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Ori Bernstein wrote:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/oridb/libgit2
>
> If someone wants to actually turn it into a git client, it at least builds
> (or used to).
>
>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016
https://bitbucket.org/oridb/libgit2
If someone wants to actually turn it into a git client, it at least builds
(or used to).
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:16:20 -0500, Dave MacFarlane wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Chris McGee wrote:
> > For git, there's a wrapper script for github and oth
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Chris McGee wrote:
> For git, there's a wrapper script for github and others. But yes, a fuller
> featured git would be good. There are some projects trying to do that in Go.
> Maybe that'll work someday.
I know I started a really half-assed, wholly-abandoned impl
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:55:38PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
> Also does anyone want to host the source tree in a repository?
This sounds like a lot of work. Who would undertake this??
khm
I have the ANSI X3.159-1989 (C89), the ISO/IEC 9989:1990 (C90) (ANSI
version) and ISO/IEC 9989:1999 (C99).
The first one I found it at the National Technical Reports Library. The
other two I do not know where I obtained them but I know they are on the
Internet, as final standards, not drafts.
On
Charlie there are some things you should know:
http://fqa.9front.org/fqa0.html
sl
Who has write access to the Wiki so that we can put the ideas in a TODO
list?
Also does anyone want to host the source tree in a repository?
On Nov 16, 2016 7:21 PM, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Add one more: EFI support
> Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmware? (Used on at least Sun SPARC
> work
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:54 PM Chris McGee wrote:
> A C compiler that supports the latest spec would be nice as long as it
> doesn't sacrifice compile times. I like how quickly the system can
> recompile itself. Maybe extend pcc to include new features?
>
I'll admit to never having paid much at
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
> Add one more: EFI support
> Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmware? (Used on at least Sun SPARC
> workstations)
>
> On Nov 16, 2016 5:27 PM, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
>
> > Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
> >
> > My desires:
> > IS
Add one more: EFI support
Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmware? (Used on at least Sun SPARC
workstations)
On Nov 16, 2016 5:27 PM, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>
> My desires:
> ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor
> Port other programming languages (espec
A C compiler that supports the latest spec would be nice as long as it doesn't
sacrifice compile times. I like how quickly the system can recompile itself.
Maybe extend pcc to include new features?
Go works pretty well and is on its way to be a supported platform. I use it
quite frequently on 9
Charlie Lin wrote:
>Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>
>My desires:
>ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor
>Port other programming languages (especially Go) to here
>Start a source code repository
>Port Git, SVN, Mercurial, et cetera to here
At the risk of being contradicted: No.
sl
I think there was a port of gcc at one time. It should be possible to use
that to port later versions of gcc.
Go is already ported, AFAIK, but I have not yet found an excuse to try it
out.
Personally, I would really like to have Ada (Gnat) working on Plan9. I
have made enough errors in C and C++ f
Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
My desires:
ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor
Port other programming languages (especially Go) to here
Start a source code repository
Port Git, SVN, Mercurial, et cetera to here
42 matches
Mail list logo