On Thu Oct 15 20:50:52 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > i'd recommend a google search
> >
> > https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant=1=2=UTF-8#q=web%20garden
> >
>
> I deeply apologize for failing to
back to upgrading the themes for El Käptn drawterm.
On 10/18/15, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Thu Oct 15 20:50:52 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> >
>> > i'd recommend a google search
>> >
>> >
To be honest, I didn’t understand the “Grey Gardens” reference until I used
this new “Google” thing that Erik recommends. Were I not scared of being
called silly by Skip, I would recommend merging this exciting new potential
fork of Plan9 into the forthcoming "Great British Code Off" fork of
Next thing we know someone will produce a Grey Gardens fork of Plan 9.
Now that I said it, it’s likely the GPL version is the Plan 9 Grey Gardens tree.
-jas
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:53 PM, Prof Brucee wrote:
>
> Sounds like a lot of bullshit to me. No fish slapping.
>
On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:32 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> No, it's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo
No, that's just management.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:35 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> As usual, the official reference was short on the implementation detail. Try
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTQfGd3G6dg
This, of course, is just the SEC review.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with
On Mon Oct 12 09:16:37 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:57:16PM +1300, Andrew Simmons wrote:
> > As a diversion from the discussion of the existential essence of
> > Javascript,
> > could I ask the group for a view on the meaning of the term "Web Garden"?
> > I was
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> i'd recommend a google search
>
> https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant=1=2=UTF-8#q=web%20garden
>
I deeply apologize for failing to summarize to your satisfaction. I
have bookmarked the url you provided and
Sounds like a lot of bullshit to me. No fish slapping.
On 16/10/2015 2:50 PM, "Kurt H Maier" wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > i'd recommend a google search
> >
> >
>
This reminds me, should you find yourself in Auckland, be sure to visit Roger
the Shrubber in Mangere for all of your Web shrubbery requirements:
http://www.localist.co.nz/l/tazcwz
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Charles Forsyth
> wrote:
>
>
> On 14 October 2015
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Yw6bz1YMdV8/VH8UTXIGcjI/DBk/FXdkiyPq_kU/s1600/monty%2Bpython%2Bgeneral%2Btoo%2Bsilly.jpg
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Andrew Simmons wrote:
> This reminds me, should you find yourself in Auckland, be sure to visit
> Roger the Shrubber in
On 14 October 2015 at 04:29, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> The reference implementation:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifmRgQX82O4
>
No, it's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo
On 14 October 2015 at 09:32, Charles Forsyth
wrote:
> No, it's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo
>
As usual, the official reference was short on the implementation detail.
Try https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTQfGd3G6dg
On Oct 13, 2015, at 1:15 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> with shrubbery to hide data from outsiders and, for defence in depth, another
> shrubbery slightly higher for a two-level
> effect, with a little path for authorised users
The reference implementation:
On 12 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> but it could also be a "Walled Garden"..
with shrubbery to hide data from outsiders and, for defence in depth,
another shrubbery slightly higher for a two-level
effect, with a little path for authorised users
sounds organic, try to avoid that job.
I thought a web garden was a hobbyist version of a server farm.
No, that's a web allotment
On 12 October 2015 at 10:49, Staven wrote:
> I thought a web garden was a hobbyist version of a server farm.
>
>
>
I think I once saw one at the Chelsea flower show,
Designed and produced by a team of 37 spiders...
-Steve
> On 12 Oct 2015, at 10:49, Staven wrote:
>
> I thought a web garden was a hobbyist version of a server farm.
>
if it's the term used by IIS, i think it refers to how a server
handles web requests: (a) one process handling all requests -- i.e.
in a select() loop -- or (b) a process pool, with each process
handling one request. the latter is a "web garden" model.
plan9's httpd starts a proc for each new
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:57:16PM +1300, Andrew Simmons wrote:
> As a diversion from the discussion of the existential essence of Javascript,
> could I ask the group for a view on the meaning of the term "Web Garden"?
> I was just asked about this in a job interview.
This is a concept that
I had never heard this term before, but this is perfect. Well done.
> I thought a web garden was a hobbyist version of a server farm.
Thanks to all for the excellent and occasionally informative suggestions. I
don’t think there’s any risk of my being offered the job, but I wish I’d had
the concepts of “web allotment” and “web sharecropper” to hand during the
interview.
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 5:13 AM, Kurt H Maier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:57:16 +1300
>Andrew Simmons wrote:
>
> As a diversion from the discussion of the existential essence of
> Javascript, could I ask the group for a view on the meaning of the
> term "Web Garden"? I was just
As a diversion from the discussion of the existential essence of Javascript,
could I ask the group for a view on the meaning of the term "Web Garden"? I was
just asked about this in a job interview. Supplementary question - how would
you implement a Web Garden in Plan9?
> On 9/10/2015, at 2:48
25 matches
Mail list logo