Re: [9fans] build system: [was: (no subject)]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, EBo wrote: > > > > Sorry for disappearing since last Friday -- emergency house repairs. Uggg > I feel like I've been beaten by mutant ninja dwarfs armed with... > something > only semi soft. Uggg. > > > here's the full list of dynamic libraries used on > > a ra

Re: [9fans] build system: [was: (no subject)]

Sorry for disappearing since last Friday -- emergency house repairs. Uggg I feel like I've been beaten by mutant ninja dwarfs armed with... something only semi soft. Uggg. > here's the full list of dynamic libraries used on > a random gentoo box i tried: > ... > libX11.so.6 ... update

Re: [9fans] build system: [was: (no subject)]

> Take a look at Boost's port of Perforce Software's build tool Jam > . What little I have used it > in the past it came across as a much more elegant tool-chain. Now what I > would LOVE to see is a port of Joel de Gusman's Spirit++. Well I can drea

Re: [9fans] build system: [was: (no subject)]

> I've also started on updating an old per-application portage ebuild based on > Anant's work back in 2007. If that is of any interest maybe I could get you > to either collaborate or just do a little testing. p9p is ment to work as a unit. i think it would be better if you didn't. - erik

[9fans] build system: [was: (no subject)]

> Of course, one would then be tempted (as I have been) to look more > seriously at porting the NetBSD package system to Plan 9. That's not > out of the question, in fact it's probably not too difficult, but the > residual pain of autoconf for each individual package has already > frightened peop