i guess ant is the solution.
http://xkcd.com/927/
http://xkcd.com/912/
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:29:05 PST Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> make
> nmake
> pmake
> bmake
> mk
> gmake
jam
cmake
scons
> i guess ant is the solution.
http://xkcd.com/927/
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:34:49PM -0800, Christopher Nielsen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 14:29, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > make
> > nmake
> > pmake
> > bmake
> > mk
> > gmake
> >
> > i guess ant is the solution. lord knows posix could not decide on a single
> > syntax. because it would mean
Having had to (grudgingly) deal with ant, I would say that it is
definitely not the solution. Ant uses XML for its syntax. I think that
says it all.
But is the ant not tattooed on the camel's nose?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 14:29, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> make
> nmake
> pmake
> bmake
> mk
> gmake
>
> i guess ant is the solution. lord knows posix could not decide on a single
> syntax. because it would mean picking one syntax. which was against the
> rules. unlike all the places where they di
make
nmake
pmake
bmake
mk
gmake
i guess ant is the solution. lord knows posix could not decide on a
single syntax. because it would mean picking one syntax. which was
against the rules. unlike all the places where they did that in the C
library. fecking eeegits.
