On Sun, 24 May 2015 17:25:54 EDT minux minux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:55 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte
are
slices - therefore they are different types.
yes, exactly.
On May 24, 2015 2:00:05 PM CDT, Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
On May 24, 2015, at 8:55 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and
[]byte are
slices - therefore they are different types.
yes, exactly. i suppose
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:55 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
and implies dynamic allocation of the slice, i'm guessing.
Don't guess. Please read the links I provided, they explain all this.
Arrays in Go are not like arrays in C and Pascal, slices are more
close. Go arrays are
On May 24, 2015, at 8:55 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte are
slices - therefore they are different types.
yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that different size arrays are not type
compatable
(yea
Go array =~ C++ std::array
Go slice =~ C++ std::vector
On May 24, 2015 12:02:54 PM CDT, Aram Hăvărneanu ara...@mgk.ro wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:55 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
and implies dynamic allocation of the slice, i'm guessing.
Don't guess. Please read the
http://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals
2015-05-24 8:55 GMT-07:00 erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net:
Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte are
slices - therefore they are different types.
yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that different
(i.e. you don't need ~65 pages of style guide just to tell you how to
write acceptable code.)
I think it's wasteful to defend Go. Let history do that...
Lucio.
2015-05-24 23:25 GMT+02:00 minux minux...@gmail.com:
Regarding the boring comment, I agree to some extent. There isn't
many fancy features that other languages have, but that's exactly the
advantage of Go, and it's the price to pay when you want readability.
(i.e. you don't need ~65 pages of
well, at least dennis wrote why pascal is not my favorite programming
language.
from go build
./cat.go:36: cannot use data (type [8192]byte) as type []byte in
argument to cat
what? perhaps i'm missing something about the language, but it sure seems
ironic.
- erik
I thought the author was Brian Kernighan?
http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/bwk/index.html
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:53 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
well, at least dennis wrote why pascal is not my favorite programming
language.
from go build
./cat.go:36: cannot use
http://blog.golang.org/slices
http://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte are
slices - therefore they are different types.
- CC
2015-05-23 17:53 GMT+02:00 erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net:
well, at least dennis wrote why pascal is not my favorite programming
language.
from go
I read the Go docs *once*, but I'm pretty sure you're right.
I think to make a slice out of an array, you'd do something like the_array[:].
All to say why I don't like Go. :)
On May 23, 2015 1:14:55 PM CDT, C Cirello uldericofi...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte
13 matches
Mail list logo
