I ended up writing a ned-alike that is just a shell script:
http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/rc/mother
This is what I actually use.
sl
Ned is what I usually use. I don't use any accompanying scripts, but I've made a number of changes to ned itself. I find g/unwanted/d to be way more efficient than acme.- erik
On 2018-11-30 10:10 AM, s...@9front.org wrote:
It's not clear why you think the interface provided by upasfs(4) is
captive, or why you insist acme needs to be involved at all. I'm
writing this message with nedmail/marshal, connected to Plan 9 in a
plain SSH terminal session -> OpenBSD -> drawterm
It's not clear why you think the interface provided by upasfs(4) is captive, or
why you insist acme needs to be involved at all. I'm writing this message with
nedmail/marshal, connected to Plan 9 in a plain SSH terminal session -> OpenBSD
-> drawterm -G. No GUI or terminal frills or frippery is
On 2018-11-30 09:02 AM, s...@9front.org wrote:
is that "mail" you mention similar to "mailx" under unix-like systems?
the problem is one of not wanting a captive user-interface to the
mailing sub-system.
On Plan 9, 'mail' is a shell script that invokes either nedmail(1) or
marshal(1), depending
> is that "mail" you mention similar to "mailx" under unix-like systems?
> the problem is one of not wanting a captive user-interface to the
> mailing sub-system.
On Plan 9, 'mail' is a shell script that invokes either nedmail(1) or
marshal(1), depending on the flags it consumes.
The nedmail pro
you can send mail with the mail command, just like traditional mailers.
reading mail: i use the same tool but envoked from faces(1) - right click on
the face of the person who sent the mail to read the message.
people tend to be very impressed with faces to this day. great interface.
-Steve
>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:27:09PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
>
> is that "mail" you mention similar to "mailx" under unix-like systems?
> the problem is one of not wanting a captive user-interface to the
> mailing sub-system.
>
You're looking for nedmail(1), I think. Hopefully sl will chime
On 2018-11-29 08:04 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:45 AM Mayuresh Kathe
wrote:
hello,
is it possible to use "upas" without relying on acme?
it might be uncomfortable (relatively speaking), but is it possible?
Yes. This is quite reasonable. To a first order approximation, `up
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:45 AM Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> hello,
>
> is it possible to use "upas" without relying on acme?
> it might be uncomfortable (relatively speaking), but is it possible?
>
Yes. This is quite reasonable. To a first order approximation, `upas` is a
mail transfer agent, for mo
Hi,
Sure, no problem. Upas exports a filesystem, you can read it :-)
Although I use plan9port version of upas with acme and my client 'amail',
sometimes I use 9p to read, for example, a raw message body to send it to
spam analitics.
But reading messages is uncomfortable, it is true.
On Thu, Nov 2
hello,
is it possible to use "upas" without relying on acme?
it might be uncomfortable (relatively speaking), but is it possible?
~mayuresh
12 matches
Mail list logo
