On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Robert Raschke rtrli...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:38 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.netwrote:
On Wed Sep 2 10:33:07 EDT 2009, rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
Q: Will C continue to be important into the future?
(Dave Kirk, Nvidia)A: No, I
Clarifying context: this was at a hpc clusters conference -- their
view of fortran is not your view of fortran.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 2, 2009, at 9:29 AM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
Q: Will C continue to be important into the future?
(Dave Kirk, Nvidia)A: No, I think C will
Found the reference:
http://graphics.cs.williams.edu/archive/SweeneyHPG2009/TimHPG2009.pdf
on p. 43/44 i believe it is claimed that one
cannot do CSP without pure functional
programming.
the thread library is clearly better than i thought.
it can turn ordinary c into a functional programming
http://graphics.cs.williams.edu/archive/SweeneyHPG2009/TimHPG2009.pdf
on p. 43/44 i believe it is claimed that one
cannot do CSP without pure functional
programming.
(p ⇒ q) ⇏ (¬p ⇒ ¬q)
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen eri...@gmail.comwrote:
Clarifying context: this was at a hpc clusters conference -- their view of
fortran is not your view of fortran.
Having supported Fortran for MPI implementations before, I know what you
mean :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
http://graphics.cs.williams.edu/archive/SweeneyHPG2009/TimHPG2009.pdf
on p. 43/44 i believe it is claimed that one
cannot do CSP without pure functional
programming.
(p ⇒ q) ⇏ (¬p ⇒ ¬q)
That's interesting
on p. 43/44 i believe it is claimed that one
cannot do CSP without pure functional
programming.
(p ⇒ q) ⇏ (¬p ⇒ ¬q)
That's interesting because pure functional programming doesn't exist at all
in the strictest sense on a computer. One MUST be able to cause side
effects during
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@coraid.com wrote:
on p. 43/44 i believe it is claimed that one
cannot do CSP without pure functional
programming.
(p ⇒ q) ⇏ (¬p ⇒ ¬q)
That's interesting because pure functional programming doesn't exist at
all
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:29 AM, ron minnichrminn...@gmail.com wrote:
Q: Will C continue to be important into the future?
(Dave Kirk, Nvidia)A: No, I think C will die like Fortran has
let me explain the joke. In HPC circles, people have been predicting
the death of fortran for 30 years. Fortran
Q: Will C continue to be important into the future?
(Dave Kirk, Nvidia)A: No, I think C will die like
Fortran has
let me explain the joke. In HPC circles, people have been
predicting
the death of fortran for 30 years. Fortran has continued to
grow and
thrive. The predictions continue,
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:27 -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com
wrote:
http://graphics.cs.williams.edu/archive/SweeneyHPG2009/TimHPG2009.pdf
on p. 43/44 i believe it is claimed that one
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Brian L. Stuart blstu...@bellsouth.netwrote:
Q: Will C continue to be important into the future?
(Dave Kirk, Nvidia)A: No, I think C will die like
Fortran has
let me explain the joke. In HPC circles, people have been
predicting
the death of fortran
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Jonathan Cast jonathancc...@fastmail.fmwrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:27 -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 13:02 -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
And if you prefer a plea to authority over logic, I haven't said
anything that Simon Peyton Jones hasn't himself said about Haskell.
Well, I disagree quite strongly about Simon Peyton Jones about a number
of things. Which I think I
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jonathan Cast jonathancc...@fastmail.fmwrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 13:02 -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
And if you prefer a plea to authority over logic, I haven't said
anything that Simon Peyton Jones hasn't himself said about Haskell.
Well, I disagree
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 12:11 -0700, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
Q: Will C continue to be important into the future?
(Dave Kirk, Nvidia)A: No, I think C will die like
Fortran has
let me explain the joke. In HPC circles, people have been
predicting
the death of fortran for 30 years.
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
