And one more associated question: with longer tags, does it make
sense to augment the dump format to save/restore tags with carriage
returns?
Paul
On 7-Oct-05, at 8:34 PM, Paul Lalonde wrote:
I have a working hack to acme that now lets me use the scroll wheel
to expand the tag to multiple
I have a working hack to acme that now lets me use the scroll wheel
to expand the tag to multiple lines and collapse it again. It seems
to have no nasty interactions with the feature set I use. Moving a
window into a slot shorter than the tag shortens the tag to fit. One
line of the body
Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a shell script called Put! that
> uses sudo to write the current buffer out.
...
> Russ
Thanks alot, that points me in the right direction.
-Derek
On 10/7/05, Dimitry Golubovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russ Cox wrote:
> > I would like to be able to write scripts like this:
> >
> > load "http://www.fedex.com/Tracking";
> > find form
> > enter "792544024753"
> > submit
Looks a whole lot like AppleScript:
using ter
why not write httpfs analogous to olefs?
diverting from the topic at hand, awk would be very interesting
if extended so that records could be defined by structured regular
expressions other than '^.*\n'.
Skip Tavakkolian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
|
| > You'd need a parser to map a document's
> now if only i could figure out how to do this in unix.
b CNAME b-long-name.some.other.domain.com.
where "b" is in your local domain zone. Not elegant, not portable,
but effective.
Another, even more evil option, is $HOSTALIASES and the file it points
to. Be afraid, be very af
> Seems like I recall seeing an Expect derrivative that worked with
> websites - can't seem to google it now. Not sure it worked as easily
> as you are describing, but it might be a step in the right direction.
I'm in the wrong academic league, but the nearest I can envisage doing
something along
> You'd need a parser to map a document's structure
> into an s-expr and then you can do all the intresting stuff
> in this awk-for-s-expr language.
sexpr and scheme are made for each other.
irc, presotto was contemplating a solution a couple of years ago.
we had to use an old version of expat x
now on sources. if you add entries like
sys=b dom=b-long-name.some.other.domain.com
(without an ip= attribute) then cs will fill
in the ip attribute using dns. this is useful
if you can't arrange to be running dns out
of your ndb files but want to set up local aliases.
now if only i could figu
> I would like to be able to write scripts like this:
>
> load "http://apc-reset/outlets.htm";
> find "yoshimi"
> nearest option, set "Immediate Reboot"
> submit
>
> or like this:
>
> load "http://www.fedex.com/Tracking";
> find form
> enter "79254402475
> A couple times I have wondered if it would make sense to
> chmod the .../data files once services are running...
> or maybe they should start off non-writable and startups
> should embody a pattern like this?
>
> chmod 664 /dev/sdC0/fossil
> fossil -f /dev/sdC0/fossil
> chmod 444 /dev/sdC0/fos
This is exactly the problem with blacklisting: you might reject
some bad mail, but you lose a lot of good mail too.
It's like chewing off your arm just because your pinky is broken.
Russ
ID-PKI
> i was going to warn at the time against typing the wrong name in
> sdXX but realised that might have an effect similar to saying
> ``don't think of an elephant'
A couple times I have wondered if it would make sense to
chmod the .../data files once services are running...
or maybe they should sta
> re this, my entire domain (lanl.gov) is blacklisted so that I can not
> post to v9fs-developers.
>
> It may be justified, however, since we have many naive users with
> Windows boxes who may, for all I know, by zombies.
This is exactly the problem with blacklisting: you might reject
some bad mai
Charles Forsyth wrote:
the quality of the blacklists is poor
re this, my entire domain (lanl.gov) is blacklisted so that I can not
post to v9fs-developers.
It may be justified, however, since we have many naive users with
Windows boxes who may, for all I know, by zombies.
ron
Dave Lukes wrote:
I'm sure we'd all like to hear of a spam-protection system which isn't a
PITA to administer
and which actually delivers the message before the recipient dies of old
age:
greylisting is too slow for our business.
Sadly, in reality, I suspect that what we have here (spamassassi
the quality of the blacklists is poor and many entries are completely unrelated
to spam, based on a silly assumption; and it's usually
impossible to correct incorrect data (because the rbl maintainers are morons,
sorry: officious morons). (all right, to be fair, perhaps most are
wonderful and of co
> i had similar luck with greylisting, validatesender, etc and SPF.
We can't greylist, we'll be validating sender in about a month and
SPF will get done ASA I convince myself I know what it "means".
> now, if i could just do something about the rbl morons, i'd be happy,
DaveL puts his finger in
Russ Cox wrote:
I would like to be able to write scripts like this:
load "http://apc-reset/outlets.htm";
find "yoshimi"
nearest option, set "Immediate Reboot"
submit
or like this:
load "http://www.fedex.com/Tracking";
find form
enter "792
Seems like I recall seeing an Expect derrivative that worked with
websites - can't seem to google it now. Not sure it worked as easily
as you are describing, but it might be a step in the right direction.
-eric
On 10/7/05, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to be able to
> Way back on September 22, 2005 Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> [how to set rwm and dma]
i was going to warn at the time against typing the wrong name in sdXX but
realised
that might have an effect similar to saying ``don't think of an elephant''.
I would like to be able to write scripts like this:
load "http://apc-reset/outlets.htm";
find "yoshimi"
nearest option, set "Immediate Reboot"
submit
or like this:
load "http://www.fedex.com/Tracking";
find form
enter "792544024753"
22 matches
Mail list logo
