> I was reminded by a discussion on another list that one convention in
> printed music is that if the key signature changes, the former
> signature is first cancelled by use of naturals, and then the new key
> signature is written.
>
> There are a couple of ways to implement this convention. Th
> De : Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : [abcusers] changing the key signature
> Date : mercredi 18 octobre 2000 21:03
>
> For a discussion of keys and modes that we haven't yet done to death:
>
> I was reminded by a discussion on another list that one conventi
Thanks folks. Thgis is not in the current version of BarFly,
but will be in the next.
Phil Taylor
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
As others have said. Use ~. We seem to all agree.
Laurie
- Original Message -
From: Phil Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
... he needs a way to place two words on one note. ...
Phil Taylor
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
Muse does pretty much that. Rather than cancel all, it cancels those
that no longer apply. So to A flat major (4 flats) to E major (4 sharps)
generates 4 naturals, then 4 sharps. You could make out a case for
three naturals, since D which was flatted is now sharped, but Muse
actually generates
At 17:52 18/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>It also mentions a
>preference that signature changes occur on a new staff with a courtesy
>key signature at the end of the previous staff and that staff left open (no
>bar at the end).
I personally prefer key changes to be somewhere in the middle of
a line ra
