I recommend that when (if?) the ABC notation standard is updated, it should
contain syntax for "helper" accidentals.
I am going to hack my version of abcm2ps (called jhabc2ps) to support
accidentals in parentheses. Does anyone have a recommendation for the
syntax?
I am thinking about using '
hi
I'd tried many times to un subscribe with no success.
Can someone pleazse remove me?
Thanks
Steph
At 21:28 14/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Phil Taylor wrote:
>
> > Would you then expect a K: field in multivoice to affect all voices
> > simultaneously? It's not the case in BarFly, since you can hav
Phil Taylor wrote:
> Would you then expect a K: field in multivoice to affect all voices
> simultaneously? It's not the case in BarFly, since you can have
> simultaneous voices playing in different keys. (I haven't actually
> found any use for this, but it might come in handy if I ever get
> av
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | So I was just talking about a feature of displaying tools, not a real
> | feature of ABC.
> | For a quick hack, for me the "^17"z8 would work, but not if I would
> | extract my clarinet part from a whole partitur.
>
> The traditional staff notation also qualifies as
John Chambers wrote:
>Phil Taylor wrote:
>| John Atchley wrote:
>| >Finally, just to throw an even bigger wrench in the works, I'm pretty
>sure I've
>| >seen a bit of abc that names the voices, instead of numbering them. I.e.
>| >something like V: alto to switch to the voice named alto. Apparent
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Henning Kiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrivit:
> | On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | >| "^20"z8 | or | !17!z8 |
> |
> | But a midiplayer would of course not wait 17 bars...
>
> Well, if it were combining multiple voices, I'd hope i
Phil Taylor wrote:
| John Atchley wrote:
| >Finally, just to throw an even bigger wrench in the works, I'm pretty sure I've
| >seen a bit of abc that names the voices, instead of numbering them. I.e.
| >something like V: alto to switch to the voice named alto. Apparently, there must
| >be some p
Henning Kiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrivit:
| On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >| "^20"z8 | or | !17!z8 |
|
| But a midiplayer would of course not wait 17 bars...
Well, if it were combining multiple voices, I'd hope it would. But
when playing just the one part, it could be
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
> John Atchley wrote:
> >On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
> >> as an option. (It's not difficult to program; you just have to treat
> >> a space following the voice number as equivalent to a line end.)
> >
> >Doing so would blow all the abc with V:1
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Henning Kiel wrote:
> I don't know how other programs than abcm2ps handle !f! symbols
> (abc2ps doesn't), but abcm2ps prints the symbols above the music line,
> but I would like to have it below...
> Do we need a %%symbolsbelow tag here?
In jaabc2ps I used two switches for ea
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In particular, we have proposals to use "^text" and !text! as
> musical annotations, where !foo! seems to be restricted to common
> musical directives, "^foo" is any sort of text above the staff, and
> "_foo" is the same text below th
John Atchley wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
>> BarFly doesn't require this; you can write the music either on the
>> same line as the V: field or on the following line, but the former
>> makes for compact and readable music, and I would like to retain it
>> as an option. (It's n
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
> BarFly doesn't require this; you can write the music either on the
> same line as the V: field or on the following line, but the former
> makes for compact and readable music, and I would like to retain it
> as an option. (It's not difficult to program;
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | have you abc2whatever writers thought about writing compact symbols
> | for rests spanning multiple bars? Especially if you have multi-voice
> | music you come across this thing and printing 20 bars of rests is very
> | annoying, even with barnumb
Henning Kiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
| > James Allwright wrote:
| > >When I first introduced the V: field into abc2midi, the syntax was very
| > >simple:
| > >
| > >V:
...
| > When I added the V: field to BarFly I considered that the voice which
| > follows a V: label was a part of the field
| have you abc2whatever writers thought about writing compact symbols
| for rests spanning multiple bars? Especially if you have multi-voice
| music you come across this thing and printing 20 bars of rests is very
| annoying, even with barnumbers and very ineffective in space.
Hmmm ... I'd think
Henning Kiel wrote
>So then why not use inline V: fields for this case?
>
>[V: 1] ab g2 | fe
>[V: 2] g2 bf | d2
>
No real reason except that it takes a couple of extra symbols, and
involves placing an inline field at the start of a line, which seems
a bit redundant.
>Looks neat and does not requ
Hi,
have you abc2whatever writers thought about writing compact symbols
for rests spanning multiple bars? Especially if you have multi-voice
music you come across this thing and printing 20 bars of rests is very
annoying, even with barnumbers and very ineffective in space.
I've seen rests spann
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
> James Allwright wrote:
>
> >When I first introduced the V: field into abc2midi, the syntax was very
> >simple:
> >
> >V:
> >
> >Since then, people have added extra fields after the voice number, which
> >is where the complication arises. Could we all agr
James Allwright wrote:
>When I first introduced the V: field into abc2midi, the syntax was very
>simple:
>
>V:
>
>Since then, people have added extra fields after the voice number, which
>is where the complication arises. Could we all agree on this first
>bit ? Simple parsers can then just ignore
20 matches
Mail list logo
