Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Phil Taylor
On 16 Aug 2004, at 14:41, Jack Campin wrote: The odd thing is, here am I, more than 30 years on, sitting at a Power Mac 9600/200 with 384Mb of memory - whereas the 1130 had 32Kb, I think, and presumably ran at a few thousand instructions per second - but despite having a few gigabytes of software u

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Christian M. Cepel
Bernard Hill wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jack Campin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes The odd thing is, here am I, more than 30 years on, sitting at a Power Mac 9600/200 with 384Mb of memory - whereas the 1130 had 32Kb, I think, and presumably ran at a few thousand instructions per second -

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Steven Bennett
Jack Campin wrote: > The odd thing is, here am I, more than 30 years on, sitting at > a Power Mac 9600/200 with 384Mb of memory - whereas the 1130 had > 32Kb, I think, and presumably ran at a few thousand instructions > per second - but despite having a few gigabytes of software under > the table

RE: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Richard Walker
I use the G++ GNU product. In fact I think they have two FORTRAN products. I've been thinking of writing an abc2abc clone in FORTRAN just to play around. To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Wil Macaulay
There are lots of Fortran compilers (both open source and payware) for the Mac under OS X. See http://hpc.sourceforge.net Unfortunately OS X won't run on the 9600... wil Bernard Hill wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jack Campin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes The odd thing is, here am I, more

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Bernard Hill
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jack Campin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes The odd thing is, here am I, more than 30 years on, sitting at a Power Mac 9600/200 with 384Mb of memory - whereas the 1130 had 32Kb, I think, and presumably ran at a few thousand instructions per second - but despite having a

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Jack Campin
>>> How many computer users nowadays have ever seen or used >>> a punch card? I have a couple in a box as souvenirs. >>> That 72 is especially bizarre. How many people these days >>> could even tell you where that strange number comes from? >> >But lots of software does it. >> I used the colum

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-16 Thread Bernard Hill
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes I used the columns after 72 for sequence numbers so I could use the sorter to put a deck of cards back in order if (when) I dropped them. Up to 72, I used for FORTRAN code. lol ... and on a good day I could get two or thr

Re: [abcusers] [OT] The Scottish schottische

2004-08-16 Thread Frank Nordberg
Randall J Elzinga wrote: (lots of interesting things and a few *very* nice links) Steve Wyrick wrote: (even more interesting info) Just a belated thank you to Randall and Steve for their help, and in case somebody missed the Scott Skinner site Randall mentioned: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/scottskinner/