Perhaps if the account is used for confidential transactions by
someone like a doctor, solicitor, prostitute or financial adviser,
Isn't this a bit redundant?? *grin*
//Christian M. Cepel - Bomby - Philippe Sebastian LeLutre
Gd Gracious people, I already retracted the suggestion TWICE as an
idiotic suggestion. Must I start an orphan's fund as well by way of
penance?
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:37 PM 3/6/02, Richard Robinson wrote:On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Jack
I'm a bit confused, reading through the documentation available online.
Our first task in development is of course to parse an abc file. I'm
trying to figure out, per the 1.6 standard, WHAT EXACTLY the _approved_
linefeed/newline character, and encoding are for abc.
I have here, a quote from
Thank you. This makes it all very clear.
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, James Allwright wrote:
On Tue 05 Mar 2002 at 11:46AM -0600, Christian Cepel wrote:
I'm a bit confused, reading through the documentation available
online.
Our first task in development is of course to parse an abc file. I'm
Good advice.. One comment below.
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Phil Taylor wrote:
If all abc programs adopted the same strategy the problem would simply
disappear (but how likely is that?).
I don't think it would completely disappear unfortunately due to those of
use who like to use external editors.
Perhaps my 'wonder' was a bit ill considered. I wasn't considering those
who want to include abc 'inline' in messages. I was kindof thinking of a
perfect world, where, if a non-ascii format were to exist, and a mime type
written for it, that all email clients and browsers/servers, ftp
