Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-16 Thread Frank Nordberg
John Chambers wrote: Hmmm ... I see I wasn't specific enough. With JPEG, GIF and PNG files, you can include them *inside* a page with a tag like: img src=http://foo.bar.com/junk.gif; alt=pretty picture This will cause the image to be displayed as part of the web page,

Re: [abcusers] antialiasing and test on ps files

2002-06-15 Thread Phil Taylor
Eric wrote: If you want to have a look, I've copied the test files here : http://anamnese.online.fr/lastened/princess.gif and http://anamnese.online.fr/lastened/princess.pdf http://anamnese.online.fr/lastened/princess.ps This seems to make my point exactly. I've put up a picture containing

Re: [abcusers] antialiasing and test on ps files

2002-06-15 Thread Frank Nordberg
Forgeot Eric wrote: I don't really agree, even if you're right in some extends : A gif file (I mean a partition) that looks cool on a browser with 16 colours is ci. 9 ko. The same in ps is 29 ko, but converted in pdf it's only 11 ko (I've tried for a small tune). Well, yes and no, Eric.

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-15 Thread Richard Robinson
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Atte Andre Jensen wrote: On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Phil Taylor wrote: John Chambers wrote: GIF is only used because browsers understand it. No, it's used because it's the most efficient way of compressing a black and white (or 256 colour) picture into a small file.

Re: [abcusers] antialiasing and test on ps files

2002-06-15 Thread Phil Taylor
I wrote: Eric wrote: If you want to have a look, I've copied the test files here : http://anamnese.online.fr/lastened/princess.gif and http://anamnese.online.fr/lastened/princess.pdf http://anamnese.online.fr/lastened/princess.ps This seems to make my point exactly. I've put up a picture

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-15 Thread Rick Davis
Richard Robinson wrote: The newer PNG format is just as good, and free, but not yet as popular. Why? For exactly one reason: browsers (the big one esp) were not supporting png until recently. And since one must expect quite a few users to still be using their 4.0 or 5.0 browsers

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-15 Thread Laura Conrad
Rick == Rick Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rick For Linux, the latest Netscape I could get (the last time I Rick checked) was 4.51 or something like that, and I don't think Rick it does PNG yet. I think it does; I think all Netscape 4.x does png. I'm running 4.73, and it

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-15 Thread Rick Davis
Laura Conrad wrote: Rick == Rick Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rick For Linux, the latest Netscape I could get (the last time I Rick checked) was 4.51 or something like that, and I don't think Rick it does PNG yet. I think it does; I think all Netscape 4.x does png. I'm

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread Paul Musgrave
Well put, Mr. Chambers. I for one appreciate your "long and useless comments." Keep up the good work! Dave Musgrave McDade, Texas, USA This is both facetious and insulting. The abcusers list existsprimarily to help users. These are mostly musicians who aren'tcomputer experts, but who are

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread jr_davis
Agreed. Why else would one subscribe to this list than to read and benefit from long and useless comments? ;-) Rick On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:15:17 -0500 Paul Musgrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well put, Mr. Chambers. I for one appreciate your long and useless comments. Keep up the good

RE: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread Christophe Declercq
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de John Chambers Envoyé : vendredi 14 juin 2002 15:25 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing Christophe writes: | Antialiasing is a feature you can turn off both in GhostView and in | Acrobat Reader

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread John Chambers
Rick writes: | Agreed. Why else would one subscribe to this list than to read and benefit from |long and useless comments? ;-) Paul Musgrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Well put, Mr. Chambers. I for one appreciate your long and useless comments. |Keep up the good work! Dave Musgrave

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread John Chambers
Christophe writes: | I find PDF a good (if not perfect it's a lot better than GIF IMHO) | format for document exchange and I found useful to say that to help | users who want to exchange music with non abc litterate friends. Yeah; PDF (and PS) are a lot better than GIF or any other format that

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread Phil Taylor
John Chambers wrote: Christophe writes: | I find PDF a good (if not perfect it's a lot better than GIF IMHO) | format for document exchange and I found useful to say that to help | users who want to exchange music with non abc litterate friends. Yeah; PDF (and PS) are a lot better than GIF or

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread Richard Robinson
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, John Chambers wrote: (Wouldn't it be useful if browsers would display PS and PDF? As far as I can tell, the reason they don't is that PS and PDF are patented formats owned by Adobe. This ought not to matter, since it's legal to decode and display them. But it's easy

Re: [abcusers] Antialiasing

2002-06-14 Thread Atte Andre Jensen
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Phil Taylor wrote: John Chambers wrote: GIF is only used because browsers understand it. No, it's used because it's the most efficient way of compressing a black and white (or 256 colour) picture into a small file. True in low resolution files, but not in print