On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:29:38 UTC, John Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I. Oppenheim writes:
>|
>| And what about:
>|
>| A B C D\
>| E:|
>
>Yup. But we have had a discussion of what should decide this one:
>There is some confusion over just what is the "next line" for the
>purposes of
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, I. Oppenheim wrote:
> Guido, can we update the standard to reflect the
> simple continuation rule defined by John below?
>
> Note that according to the standard as it is currently
> defined, the second line in my example would be
> interpreted as a header, and not as a note. T
Guido, can we update the standard to reflect the
simple continuation rule defined by John below?
Note that according to the standard as it is currently
defined, the second line in my example would be
interpreted as a header, and not as a note. This is
very illogical and confusing. We need to get r
