On 24 Jun 2003 22:37:23 -0400, Christopher Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Jean-Francois,
Hello Chris,
[snip]
>BTW, I'm using abcm2ps-2.11.3 (May 5, 2002) if that makes any
>difference.
[snip]
It makes! Annotations work correctly starting from version 3.5.0.
About deco.abc,
Using "<("">)"G with abcm2ps 3.3.1 actually produces something like:
(
>)
to the left of the note, seemingly taking the string after < as a unit and ignoring the middle quotes. This does more or less accord with the 1.7.6 version of abc which says (in the copy from Chris
TECTED]
> Subject: Re: [abcusers] abcm2ps, guitar chords, vocal music, etc.
>
> Chris comments:
> | Jean-Francois,
> |
> | I just got around to trying out your suggestion below for enclosing a
> | note in parentheses:
> |
> | >
> | > Yes, you may use annotatio
Chris comments:
| Jean-Francois,
|
| I just got around to trying out your suggestion below for enclosing a
| note in parentheses:
|
| >
| > Yes, you may use annotations:
| >
| > "<("">)"A
|
| And it doesn't work. Instead of getting a note in parentheses, what I
| get is a "guitar chord" that l
Jean-Francois,
I just got around to trying out your suggestion below for enclosing a
note in parentheses:
>
> Yes, you may use annotations:
>
> "<("">)"A
And it doesn't work. Instead of getting a note in parentheses, what I
get is a "guitar chord" that looks like this:
<(
>)
The pro
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:32:45 -0400, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>(NOTE - using abcm2ps)
>
>Problem 1:
>As far as I can tell, you can only align chords with actual notes.
>This is a problem for me. Suppose I have a measure that looks
>like this (M:C, L:1/4)
>
>E/D/ C3
>
>and I wan
AIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [abcusers] abcm2ps, guitar chords, vocal music, etc.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Problem 1:
> > As far as I can tell, you can only align chords with actual notes.
> > This is a problem for me. Suppose I have a measure that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem 1:
As far as I can tell, you can only align chords with actual notes.
This is a problem for me. Suppose I have a measure that looks
like this (M:C, L:1/4)
E/D/ C3
and I want guitar chords to change on beats 1 and 3. If I do this:
"Am"E/D/ "C"C3
It looks l
> How about
>
> "Am"E/D/ C-"C"C2
>
> ?
>
> This would also be clearer to read for the accompanist, and it doesn't violate
> the guideline that the third beat of a bar in common time should be visibly
> delineated (ie beat two shouldn't be a dotted minim!)
>
>This is a real "guideline"? I'v
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:21:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a real "guideline"? I've never heard that one before.
I think it's the generally accepted way in Western classical music. As
you imply, jazz may have its own conventions (I don't know much about
jazz).
Dave
To subscribe
>
> How about
>
> "Am"E/D/ C-"C"C2
>
> ?
>
> This would also be clearer to read for the accompanist, and it doesn't violate
> the guideline that the third beat of a bar in common time should be visibly
> delineated (ie beat two shouldn't be a dotted minim!)
>
This is a real "guideline"? I
On Monday 16 June 2003 2:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Suppose I have a measure that looks
> like this (M:C, L:1/4)
>
> E/D/ C3
>
> and I want guitar chords to change on beats 1 and 3. If I do this:
>
> "Am"E/D/ "C"C3
>
> It looks like the "C" chord should start on beat 2. If I put the "C"
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
