Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Ford
h...@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta "all-in-one-installer"! Hi Jason, We've been seeing the same problems with not being able to receive h261as streams, except that we have AG 3.1 on all of our Windows ma

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-10 Thread Thomas D. Uram
sgri...@clix.aarnet.edu.au<mailto:accessgri...@clix.aarnet.edu.au>; ag-tech...@googlegroups.com<mailto:ag-tech...@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta "all-in-one-installer"! Hi Jason, We've been seeing the same problems with no

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Ford
Saturday, 7 March 2009 5:21 AM To: Jason Bell Cc: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov>; accessgri...@clix.aarnet.edu.au<mailto:accessgri...@clix.aarnet.edu.au>; ag-tech...@googlegroups.com<mailto:ag-tech...@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Possible probl

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-09 Thread Jason Bell
, Jason. From: Andrew Ford [mailto:acf0...@rit.edu] Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2009 5:21 AM To: Jason Bell Cc: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov; accessgri...@clix.aarnet.edu.au; ag-tech...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta "all-in-one-installer"! Hi Jas

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-07 Thread Thomas D. Uram
On Linux, I'm sure USE_H261AS is defined in the Makefile. On Windows, it is or was missing from the Visual Studio project files. There's an --enable-gpl configure option and then some related dependencies (ffmpeg, etc.). On Windows, there are different build configurations, including some GPL

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-07 Thread Andrew Ford
Hi Tom, Would that only occur on Windows? I checked out the vic 264 branch and compiled it on Linux without any special options and it can receive the 261as stream. A related question: when I run the vic that I just compiled, the 264 and mpeg4 buttons aren't in the encoder menu. Are there speci

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-07 Thread Thomas D. Uram
The problem is likely that the 264 vic was built without 'USE_H261AS' defined. Tom On 3/6/09 3:25 PM, Andrew Ford wrote: Correction: on Windows, 261as works with the normal version of vic associated with the regular VideoConsumerService and not with the h.264 consumer service. The fact tha

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-07 Thread Andrew Ford
Correction: on Windows, 261as works with the normal version of vic associated with the regular VideoConsumerService and not with the h.264 consumer service. The fact that it doesn't show up at all implies to me that it's a network issue of some kind and not, say, a decoder issue. I might try and

Re: [AG-TECH] Possible problems with the 3.2 Beta"all-in-one-installer"!

2009-03-07 Thread Andrew Ford
Hi Jason, We've been seeing the same problems with not being able to receive h261as streams, except that we have AG 3.1 on all of our Windows machines. Our Macs can see 261as streams just fine. Has anyone else tried 261as on Windows? --Andrew 2009/3/3 Jason Bell mailto:j.b...@cqu.edu.au>>