Re: ACCMAIL Digest - 1 Aug 2009 to 13 Aug 2009 (#2009-26)

2009-08-21 Thread Vlad Ladir
Hi. I see constant improvements of service www at dommel.be . I like result very much. Thank you. Please inform about (may be) new possibility. -- Regards, Vlad mailto:la...@mail333.com -- To contribut

Re: ACCMAIL Digest - 1 Aug 2009 to 13 Aug 2009 (#2009-26)

2009-08-18 Thread Vlad Ladir
Hghy, Jan. 14 aug 2009 г., 13:17:50: JW> 2009/8/14 Jan Wagemakers : >> I have just tested it and indeed it is not working. It seems that at the >> moment there is a problem with the proxy-server that I use. I'll try to >> figure out a more reliable way. >> I'll keep you informed. And hey, thank

Re: ACCMAIL Digest - 1 Aug 2009 to 13 Aug 2009 (#2009-26)

2009-08-18 Thread Jan Wagemakers
2009/8/14 : [...@dommel.be] > Yes it works now! Will it be always so? :D Probably not ;-) > Thanks for help and interest for webBYmail. Hey, it's great to see that after al these years accmail still exists. However, it is sad to read that Mr Gerald Boyd has died. I remember him at the time tha

Re: ACCMAIL Digest - 1 Aug 2009 to 13 Aug 2009 (#2009-26)

2009-08-14 Thread Vlad Ladir
Hello, I too like experiments in network and with interest has read this massage. has sent the test in several variants (and in subject and in body), but - no reaction. It is pity. can author elaborate what is it necessary to do? thank you. > A long time ago, I think 1997 -1999, I was subscrib

Re: ACCMAIL Digest - 1 Aug 2009 to 13 Aug 2009 (#2009-26)

2009-08-14 Thread Jan Wagemakers
2009/8/14 : >> Anyway, for those who like to test it : >> >> Send an E-mail to www AT dommel.be with in the subject-line : >> >> send txt http://some.webpage.url/index.html >> >> or >> >> send pdf http://some.webpage.url/index.html >> >> txt gives a text-version of the webpage, pdf gives an pdf-a

Re: ACCMAIL Digest - 1 Aug 2009 to 13 Aug 2009 (#2009-26)

2009-08-14 Thread Jan Wagemakers
2009/8/14 Jan Wagemakers : > I have just tested it and indeed it is not working. It seems that at the > moment there is a problem with the proxy-server that I use. I'll try to > figure out a more reliable way. > > I'll keep you informed. And hey, thanks for testing! :-) OK, I have changed some th