Hi Derek
A small comment on ECC performance inline.
On 02/09/2017 05:10 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Mike,
Michael StJohns writes:
On 2/8/2017 8:19 AM, Mohit Sethi wrote:
Hi Mike
At least with our measurements on an 8-bit microprocessor platform,
1024-bit RSA exponentiation was extremely slow
Hi Ludwig and ACE ML,
Thank you very much Ludwig for your effort,
I have not yet read the new version of the draft, but I already had
some thoughts about the "Client Token" (CT) concept, so I give a
partial response to your questions (also in the hope to trigger the
discussion on the ML):
a) I th
Moi Mohit,
One note on the timing constraints, if you use, for example, the Schnorr
signature system you can precompute the group operation and do only one hash
and one field operation with the fresh data. Similar optimization could be done
for DSA, but it is more commonly mentioned in the Schn
Hi,
Mohit Sethi writes:
> Regarding the performance of 160-bit ECDSA on our 8-bit platform. We
> experimented with a couple of different libraries and found that the
> signature operation took anywhere between 800 ms - 2000 ms. The exact
> numbers can be found in Tables 2,3,4,5 and 6 of the draf
See inline
From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Somaraju Abhinav
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 2:47 AM
To: Jim Schaad ;
draft-somaraju-ace-multic...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: 'ace'
Subject: Re: [Ace] draft-somaraju-ace-multicast
Comment inline
From: Somaraju Abhinav [mailto
