On 22/05/2019 23:58, Jim Schaad wrote:
5. Is there an intention to provide a "standard" format for the scope field
or just to leave it as ad hoc?
I would be very much in favor of this, or at least provide guidelines to
avoid adding to this: https://www.brandur.org/oauth-scope
/Ludwig
On 21/05/2019 22:35, Cigdem Sengul wrote:
Thank you for your comments. I see that we tried to cover too many
options in the draft, and things got mixed up.I tried to clarify inline.
* So as a client I get a token from the AS. For the first run,
assume that
it has a RPK in it.
Thanks for the updates from my last message. This has helped quite a bit.
1. A discussion of the use of raw public keys rather than certificates for
the server may be in order. This can refer to the same RPK issues from the
current DTLS document. It may also be that this just uses normal
certi
