Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Sorry, forgot the git link
https://github.com/SanKumar2015/EST-coaps/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Aissue
+%22s+IESG%22
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2020 1:12 PM
To: ace@ietf.org; i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace]
Hello,
This iteration addresses all IESG reviews. More details on the feedback and
how we addressed it are in the git issues here
Rgs,
Panos
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2020 1:00 PM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc:
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Olaf Bergmann
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 2:03 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: ace@ietf.org; 'Benjamin Kaduk' ;
draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-09
Jim,
Jim Schaad writes:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : EST over secure CoAP (EST-coaps)
Authors : Peter van der Stok
Hi Panos,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, at 5:32 PM, Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> > Just to clarify: the original EST URIs are prohibited in COAP-EST?
>
> No we don't forbid them in the draft. We do not make them MTI either though.
> The long URIs can be supported and they would
Hi Alexey,
> Just to clarify: the original EST URIs are prohibited in COAP-EST?
No we don't forbid them in the draft. We do not make them MTI either though.
The long URIs can be supported and they would be a non-default EST-coaps
resource that a server could support and a client could do
Hi Panos,
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, at 5:20 AM, Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> This commit
> https://github.com/SanKumar2015/EST-coaps/commit/77d65f0eb7a28282f363e5e48cd0d28970f9366e
> should address your feedback. The full discussion is in
>
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Jim,
Jim Schaad writes:
[Ben's review]
> We also are potentially in violation of the framework's requirements with
> respect to the independent selection of profiles for client/AS and client/RS
> interactions -- at present, when DTLS+RPK is used for client/RS, we require
> that DTLS+RPK is
10 matches
Mail list logo
