Hannes,
This is going to be a long email and I hope that I do not get too many
things wrong in the process of getting it written up.
So the question that you raised is can the current MQTT profile use the
existing OAuth and ACE-OAuth protocols. My assertion is that the answer is
yes and I will
Hi Jim,
Thanks a lot for this review!
We have taken it into account in the latest submitted -01, together with
the followup discussion on the same thread on the list.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-ace-oscore-gm-admin-01
Please, see some replies inline.
Best,
/Marco
On 2019-11-20
Hello ACE,
We have submitted an updated version of draft-tiloca-ace-oscore-gm-admin
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-ace-oscore-gm-admin-01
The document describes a RESTful interface on the OSCORE Group Manager
(resource server), intended for an Administrator (client) to create and
Hello ACE,
We have submitted a major updated version of
draft-tiloca-ace-group-oscore-profile
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-ace-group-oscore-profile-02
The document describes a profile of ACE where client and server
communicate with Group OSCORE. This supports fine-grained access
Hi Travis,
Thank you very much for your review! We have addressed it in the latest
submitted version -01
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification-01
Please, see some detailed replies inline below.
Best,
/Marco
On 2019-11-21 08:43, Travis Spencer wrote:
> Hi All,
Hello ACE,
We have submitted an updated version of
draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification-01
The document describes how an Authorization Server can notify Clients
and Resource Servers of revoked but yet not expired
>
>
> [CS] Yes. We opted for not keeping any state because that indeed had too
> many problematic issues. One was, as I already mentioned, extra state kept
> for a time determined by the client (session expiry) - which we thought
> would cause trouble. There are some non-normative text in MQTT
Hi Ben, ace,
These 2 updates (09 and 10) address almost all the AD review comments of v-08.
V-09 covers the majority of them, as we discussed in this thread:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/rgVfs3dzcWQnNlXn331DdpQfwwQ/ and
listed in this issue: