Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: (Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) using the OAuth 2.0 Framework (ACE-OAuth)) to Proposed

2019-12-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 11:07:34AM -0800, Jim Schaad wrote: > Personal opinion, > > I think that we should be requesting a separate page. I think we are going > to have enough different registries that keeping them separate from OAuth is > going to be useful in preventing confusion. For the

Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: (Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) using the OAuth 2.0 Framework (ACE-OAuth)) to Proposed

2019-12-21 Thread Jim Schaad
Personal opinion, I think that we should be requesting a separate page. I think we are going to have enough different registries that keeping them separate from OAuth is going to be useful in preventing confusion. For the mapping registries, it might be useful to see if IANA can give us a

Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: (Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) using the OAuth 2.0 Framework (ACE-OAuth)) to Proposed

2019-12-21 Thread Ludwig Seitz
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT Subject: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: (Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) using the OAuth 2.0 Framework (ACE-OAuth)) to Proposed Standard (BEGIN IANA COMMENTS) IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Functions Operator has completed its