Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

Michael Richardson schreef op 2018-03-15 09:00: peter van der Stok wrote: >> >> DTLS connection is going to be required to act as an RA. RAs >> are required >> >> to have the entire request for adding authentication as necessary. >> >> > This is

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> Jim Schaad wrote: >> > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format extension is >> > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and 1.3 >> > section for clarity. >>

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

peter van der Stok wrote: >> >> DTLS connection is going to be required to act as an RA. RAs >> are required >> >> to have the entire request for adding authentication as necessary. >> >> > This is visible in the figure of section 6, but needs elaboration

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

>> * Should probably add a note in section 6 that any proxy that terminates >> the >> DTLS connection is going to be required to act as an RA. RAs are required >> to have the entire request for adding authentication as necessary. > This is visible in the figure of

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:44:37PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Jim Schaad wrote: > > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format > extension is > > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and > 1.3 > >

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

Jim Schaad wrote: > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format extension is > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and 1.3 > section for clarity. I don't understand what you are referring to. What is the

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

peter van der Stok wrote: >> * In section 6- All proxies are required by CoAP blocking to re-assemble >> the entire message at the proxy. It can re-block things going to the next >> proxy. While there is no requirement that the proxy get the entire message

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:08:05AM +0100, peter van der Stok wrote: > Hi Jim, > > thanks for the comments. See my reactions below. > Jim Schaad schreef op 2018-03-10 22:15: > > I agree with Hannes, this version of the document is much cleaner and > > much > > clearer. I think that it has solved

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

Hi Jim, thanks for the comments. See my reactions below. Jim Schaad schreef op 2018-03-10 22:15: I agree with Hannes, this version of the document is much cleaner and much clearer. I think that it has solved most of the problems that I initially had with the draft. It is not ready to

[Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

I agree with Hannes, this version of the document is much cleaner and much clearer. I think that it has solved most of the problems that I initially had with the draft. It is not ready to progress as there are still sections that are marked as TODO. But it is much closer to finishing that it