RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Release 0.61

2004-09-24 Thread Scott McCrory
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:57:38 -0700, March, Andres wrote +1 for Apache guidelines And +1 for a 1.0 release after a maven build is implemented +1 to what he said :-) . Scott --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be

[Acegisecurity-developer] Instance security

2004-09-24 Thread App Fuse mailing list
hi all, I'm just starting to learn about acegisecurity. I've been looking at the archive and was just wondering what the current status of: Instance security in .61 Documentation on the above. Example applications/code using above. newbie :-) Thanks !!!

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Instance security

2004-09-24 Thread Scott McCrory
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:53:12 +0100, App Fuse mailing list wrote hi all, I'm just starting to learn about acegisecurity. I've been looking at the archive and was just wondering what the current status of: Instance security in .61 Documentation on the above. Example applications/code

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Release 0.61

2004-09-24 Thread Sean Radford
March, Andres wrote: +1 for Apache guidelines And +1 for a 1.0 release after a maven build is implemented I concur -- Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bladesys.demon.co.uk/ --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Release 0.61

2004-09-24 Thread Colin Sampaleanu
Ben Alex wrote: Scott McCrory wrote: No objections - release early and release often... But are you sure it's just a 0.61 release? I'd recommend 0.7, as most non-programmers (and some bit twiddlers too) consider anything prior to 1.0 not mature enough for production, and I think Acegi is a

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Release 0.61

2004-09-24 Thread Ricardo Matinata
IMHO : +1 for Apache guidelines. +1 for 0.6.1 (same reason as Ben). --- Ricardo On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:52:44 +1000, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott McCrory wrote: No objections - release early and release often... But are you sure it's just a 0.61 release? I'd recommend 0.7, as

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Release 0.61

2004-09-24 Thread Shishir K. Singh
+1 for Apache guidelines. +1 for 0.6.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Matinata Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Release 0.61 IMHO : +1 for Apache

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Instance security

2004-09-24 Thread March, Andres
Everything in the acl package is specifically for this purpose. It is fairly well documented but the best way to learn is to look at the test cases. I am using the ACL stuff for instance based security but have a different data model, so I wrote my own DAO to return ACL entries. I really like