Joseph Dane wrote:
a somewhat related issue that I'm going to need to address soon is
multiple default targets. that is, say you've got three classes of
users, and you want to provide a different home URL for each. each
might hit the same login page (or not) but after the successful login
we
Wasnt the AntPathMatcher refactored and added to the Spring 1.2 RC2 ?
If so, what version of Spring are you using?
Mark
Scott McCrory
[EMAIL
Yes, unfortunately it does. Acegi 0.8.2 requires Spring 1.2.
-Ray
On 7/12/05, Scott McCrory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben,
Thanks for the quick attention to a security fix release, but I'm getting
an error with the upgrade from 0.8.1:
Scott McCrory wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:18:33 -0500, Ray Krueger wrote
Yes, unfortunately it does. Acegi 0.8.2 requires Spring 1.2.
-Ray
Ahh, thought so. No joy for those of us still running in JDK 1.3 containers
like Websphere 5.
Just a general statement, but there are a LOT of
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:13:09 -1000, Seth Ladd wrote
Luckily the security fix is available for Acegi 0.7.x. That's still
compatible with Spring 1.1.x.
True, but that's a stiff downgrade from 0.8.1, especially considering the
filter changes.
Scott
Scott McCrory wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:18:33 -0500, Ray Krueger wrote
Yes, unfortunately it does. Acegi 0.8.2 requires Spring 1.2.
-Ray
Ahh, thought so. No joy for those of us still running in JDK 1.3 containers
like Websphere 5.
Just a general statement, but there are a LOT
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:28:18 +1000, Ben Alex wrote
Just for the record, 0.8.2 was motivated as many people were happily
on 0.8.1 but then Spring 1.2 came out and this broke Acegi Security
0.8.1. The majority of the community wanted 0.8.2 to be released
ASAP which supports Spring 1.2.
Scott McCrory wrote:
In short, I'd be just a tiny voice asking for Spring 1.2+ to maintain JDK
1.3 compatability, but is it too late to decouple Acegi from Spring 1.2+?
I'll move this to the Spring Developers mailing list, as it's more
related to Spring than Acegi Security. Juergen posted
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:49:24 +1000, Ben Alex wrote
Scott McCrory wrote:
In short, I'd be just a tiny voice asking for Spring 1.2+ to maintain JDK
1.3 compatability, but is it too late to decouple Acegi from Spring 1.2+?
I'll move this to the Spring Developers mailing list, as it's
