Mark St.Godard wrote:
I just wanted to make sure I dont check in code that breaks JDK 1.4
users from building the CVS HEAD examples, etc.
Therefore to sum up:
- can we package the core-tiger classes into the single acegi security dist?
- where should the new samples (for java5) be located?
Hey Ben,
Just wanted to mention, I have started converting over the
"attributes" sample apps over to Java 5 annotations version. (Havent
checked in yet)
samples/attributes (Commons)
samples/annotations (Java 5)
Basically, I ported over the BankService code and created tests.
Also, I did port o
Hi Ben, (welcome back :)
Great, the isAuthenticated() is the exact key we need to determine
this particular even, irrespective of the cache.
I also agree that it should not be in the AuthenticationProviders...
Ben, I created a JIRA entry for this (SEC-50), you can assign to me
if you want.
Che
Ben, Sure thing, thanks for the feedback, will do.
Cheers,
Mark
On 8/21/05, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark St.Godard wrote:
>
> >I did some local testing with the Contacts sample and did some simple tests
> >of
> >- logging in (i.e. User 1)
> >- going to /secure/debug.jsp (view Use
For some time Spring Rich has been using an old version of Acegi
Security. I have just updated Spring Rich CVS HEAD to work with Acegi
Security 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT. The Petclinic sample demonstrates this.
The JIRA issue has been closed:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-6
Clarence Ho wrote:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
net.sf.acegisecurity.providers.UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken
Most ClassCastExceptions are caused because there's an extra
acegi-security-*.jar on your classpath. It should only be inside your
WAR's WEB-INF/lib directory.
Cheers
Ben
Jared Odulio wrote:
Hi Ben,
Yes, I managed to fix it. I have taken some notes too:
http://jaredtech.blogspot.com/2005/08/webworkvelocityacegi-config.html
I am if this is case works for others but it worked for me.
Hi Jared
I added your blog entry to our "articles" page to help others find
Tim Kettering wrote:
Same here – cannot access CVS since yesterday. I guess SF is messed
up… again.
SF have been upgrading CVS - again. I had problems last week as well,
but it's fine now.
Cheers
Ben
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the
Tim Kettering wrote:
I’m wondering if there was a reason that most of Acegi’s standard ACL
classes use int when dealing with object id values. We usually default
to using ‘long’ instead of ‘int’ – and I believe that other places do
as well, so it seems to me that it might be simpler to use ‘lo
Malzahn Volker , Köln wrote:
So I would suggest to choose solution 2.).
Hi Volker
Well spotted, I've fixed in CVS (using solution 2).
Cheers
Ben
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 20
Sergio Bossa wrote:
Moreover, have you considered my first point?
Why does Acegi try to re-authenticate the user, even if it is already
authenticated?
And why does this happen only sometimes?
Hi Sergio
Would you please advise if you are using CVS HEAD, as it contains a
number of improve
Mark St.Godard wrote:
Ben et al,
Just a note, I have checked in some initial Security annotation
support and unit tests.
Feedback is always welcome, and please let me know if anyone has
any problems with the new subproject.
Great work Mark.
Are there any users out there using Acegi Sec
Andy Depue wrote:
I wonder, though, if the ACL functionality would be a
better solution for this sort of thing? The Voter we created below was just
a quick hack, really.
The BasicAclVoter is designed to locate the first domain object argument
in a method invocation, and then lookup the ACL
Mark St.Godard wrote:
I did some local testing with the Contacts sample and did some simple tests of
- logging in (i.e. User 1)
- going to /secure/debug.jsp (view User 1 info)
- going to a jsp that handles the switch (i.e. switchUser.jsp)
- submit request to 'su' to another user (i.e. User 2)
Mark St.Godard wrote:
The HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter should be able to set some
sort of indicator that this is the first logon attempt since it
generates a new SecurityContext however this wouldnt work for
remote client authentication?
IMHO we should modify all event-aware Authen
Robert r. Sanders wrote:
After a couple false starts which in retrospect I shouldn't have
checked into the CVS HEAD, I have finally cleaned up the code and
gotten an updated version of the LDAPPasswordAuthenticationDao, along
with a unit test, into the CVS HEAD. I will post a similar message
Hi Ben,
Yes, I managed to fix it. I have taken some notes too:
http://jaredtech.blogspot.com/2005/08/webworkvelocityacegi-config.html
I am if this is case works for others but it worked for me.
Ben Alex wrote:
Jared Odulio wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks, I've registered already. So while waiting
Jared Odulio wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks, I've registered already. So while waiting for the activation
email to arrive. I am going to post a few more info. I am using Acegi
Security version 0.9.0 Snapshot that I build myself. I am running the
Contact Sample and my application in Sun Java System A
Pascal Gehl wrote:
I've made an entry in my blog on acegi.
Hi Pascal
I've added your blog entry to the Acegi Security "articles" page.
Cheers
Ben
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 20
19 matches
Mail list logo
