Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.6 release

2004-08-04 Thread Ben Alex
March, Andres wrote: I am still wondering about the usage of the acl stuff. I see in your test how the GrantedAuthorityEffectiveAclsResolver can be used directly but would it be worthwhile to provide a voter that can perform acl authorization? I will be writing one in about 3 weeks but I am sure 0

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.6 release

2004-08-04 Thread March, Andres
t for that. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ben Alex > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.6 release > > Hi everyone > &g

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.6 release

2004-08-04 Thread ray . krueger
Unfortunately I've been pretty swamped at work as of late, and haven't had the opprotunity to put together any external documenation on theĀ  Jaas provider. The classes are pretty heavily javadoc'd, and are not that complex at all really. The only real complexity is Jaas itself, more so than knowin

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.6 release

2004-08-04 Thread Mark St Godard
[Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing

[Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.6 release

2004-08-03 Thread Ben Alex
Hi everyone Today I upgraded Acegi Security CVS to Spring 1.1 RC 1 JARs and the integration tests system has shown no incompatibilities. It's almost time to release version 0.6: - Unit tests and container integration tests pass - The upgrade-05-06.txt file is complete - Unit test coverage is 97.7