at the moment. I'll file a JIRA issue on it.
-tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ben Alex
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 6:14 AM
To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] using long for acegi acl
] On Behalf Of
Tim Kettering
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:42 AM
To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] using long for acegi acl id
parameters
Ben,
Yes, sorry I wasn't clear on which class. I meant the AclDetailsHolder in
the JdbcDaoImpl. I've been
Tim Kettering wrote:
I’m wondering if there was a reason that most of Acegi’s standard ACL
classes use int when dealing with object id values. We usually default
to using ‘long’ instead of ‘int’ – and I believe that other places do
as well, so it seems to me that it might be simpler to use
Im wondering if there was a reason that most of Acegis
standard ACL classes use int when dealing with object id values. We usually
default to using long instead of int and I
believe that other places do as well, so it seems to me that it might be
simpler to use long in the acegi
