When using an afterInvocationManager it may not always be
necessary or possible to provide before invocation security, so why require an
ADM? I just use one that is allows everyone and abstentions to pass but it
seems like a bit of overhead when all I really care about is filtering the
res
March, Andres wrote:
When using an afterInvocationManager it may not always be necessary or
possible to provide before invocation security, so why require an
ADM? I just use one that is allows everyone and abstentions to pass
but it seems like a bit of overhead when all I really care about is
> To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] why require an ADM
>
> March, Andres wrote:
>
> > When using an afterInvocationManager it may not always be necessary
or
> > possible to provide before invocation security, so why requir
