Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-04.txt

2018-08-15 Thread Roland Shoemaker
+1, will do. > On Aug 15, 2018, at 12:54 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > > Roland: > > Thanks for the update. In addition to the changes that I requested, you > added: > > The extnValue of the id-pe-acmeIdentifier extension is the ASN.1 DER > encoding of the Authorization structure. > > Aut

Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-04.txt

2018-08-15 Thread Russ Housley
Roland: Thanks for the update. In addition to the changes that I requested, you added: The extnValue of the id-pe-acmeIdentifier extension is the ASN.1 DER encoding of the Authorization structure. Authorization is just an OCTET STRING. For clarity, it might be useful to say: The extn

[Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-04.txt

2018-08-15 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management Environment WG of the IETF. Title : ACME TLS ALPN Challenge Extension Author : Roland Bracewell Shoemaker

[Acme] acme - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 103

2018-08-15 Thread IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Rich Salz, a Chair of the acme working group. - Working Group Name: Automated Certificate Management Environment Area Name: Security Area Session Requester: Rich Salz Number of Se

[Acme] Need doc shepherds

2018-08-15 Thread Salz, Rich
We have three documents that are in WG last call. All should be ready for advancing to the IESG. The one open issue is about OID assignment for draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-03. Russ has made an assignment that differs from the current draft in that it avoids an extra sub-arc. Can the authors pleas

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-03

2018-08-15 Thread Salz, Rich
Everything can be solved by an extra level of indirection, but in this case I agree that there is no need for a new sub-arc. ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-03

2018-08-15 Thread Russ Housley
One additional point. The same IANA process would be used to get object identifiers for subsequent versions. The difference is which table the value comes from. Russ > On Aug 15, 2018, at 11:10 AM, Richard Barnes wrote: > > I don't really think it matters much who's going to make a new ver

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-03

2018-08-15 Thread Richard Barnes
I don't really think it matters much who's going to make a new version. The only difference here is whether you go back to IANA to get a new code point. Given that the IANA process is not onerous, it seems like the extra couple of octets are not really adding anything here. So I'm inclined to do

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-03

2018-08-15 Thread Russ Housley
Since the document includes: id-pe-acmeIdentifier OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 31 } I have asked IANA to make this assignment. It made this request to avoid a future conflict. I do not see any value in another table subordinate to this value. Russ > On Aug 14, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Rol