Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-acme-acme-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ie
>> base64url = [A-Z] / [a-z] / [0-9] / "-" / "_"
> base64url = (%x40-5A) / (%x61-7A) / (%x30-39) / "-" / "_"
“A” is %x41 (not %x40)
--
James Manger
___
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 8:10 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>
> I am not an ART AD, but there is not yet an internationalization
> directorate, and seeing statements like "inputs for digest computations
> MUST be encoded using the UTF-8 character set" (Section 5) without
> additional discussion of
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the detailed review. Responses to the DISCUSS comments inline.
My co-author Daniel McCarney is working on the COMMENT comments.
--Richard
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:53 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> It looks like the server returns an unauthenticated "badSignatureAlgorithm"
>
At 17:07 29/08/2018 Wednesday, Daniel McCarney wrote:
>>Â I think SHOULD basically makes redirects non interoperable. I think a bit
>>more text explaining why SHOULD or change this to MUST. Also, if there are
>>some security issues related to redirects, adding a pointer here would be
>>good.
>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 04:55:09PM +, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I read the link you posted, thanks.
>
> As long as we’re not breaking the HTTP spec, I agree that SHOULD seems to get
> the most interop. As long as we’re getting signed reponses back, I don’t
> think it matters much where the redire
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-acme-acme-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://ww
I noticed that we already had some text in the security considerations
about redirects, so I reverted to SHOULD and added a forward pointer.
> More limited forms of delegation can also lead to an unintended
> party gaining the ability to successfully complete a validation
> transaction. For exampl
I read the link you posted, thanks.
As long as we’re not breaking the HTTP spec, I agree that SHOULD seems to get
the most interop. As long as we’re getting signed reponses back, I don’t think
it matters much where the redirect sends you.
___
Acme ma
Updated the PR. Trimmed below.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:26 AM Alexey Melnikov
wrote:
>
>> 6.4.1. Replay-Nonce
>>
>>The "Replay-Nonce" header field includes a server-generated value
>>that the server can use to detect unauthorized replay in future
>>client requests. The server MU
Thanks for the response! One clarification below:
Ben.
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
[...]
>
>
> *** Editorial and Nits ***
>
>
> §10.2: "
>It is RECOMMENDED that the server perform DNS queries and make HTTP
>connections from various network perspectives...
>
> > I think SHOULD basically makes redirects non interoperable. I think a
> bit more text explaining why SHOULD or change this to MUST. Also, if there
> are some security issues related to redirects, adding a pointer here would
> be good.
>
I'm slightly adverse to changing this to a MUST. There'
Hi Richard,
On 29/08/2018 16:03, Richard Barnes wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Thanks for the comments. A couple of replies are below; resulting
edits are in this PR:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/442
I deleted comments where we are in agreement. More comments below:
--Richard
On Wed
Hi Alexey,
Thanks for the comments. A couple of replies are below; resulting edits
are in this PR:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/442
--Richard
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 7:14 AM Alexey Melnikov
wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-acme
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the comments. A couple of replies are below; resulting edits
are in this PR:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/441
--Richard
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:46 PM Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-acme-acme-14:
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-acme-acme-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to http
16 matches
Mail list logo
