[Acme] acme - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 112

2021-10-15 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Deb Cooley, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. acme Session 1 (1:00 requested) Thursday, 11 November 2021, Session II 1430-1530 Room Name: Room 8 size: 508

Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption

2021-10-15 Thread Seo Suchan
I think it'd better to not limit challenge type to dns-01, but to any challenge type that CA is be allowed to issue wildcard cert from it. there may be add another challenge type (like using rfc8823's mail challange to CAA iodef or whois mail?) or DNS challenge may needed to amend to dns-02 in

Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption

2021-10-15 Thread Richard Barnes
I have read the document, and support its adoption. This functionality actually reflects the existing behavior of a lot of CAs in the Web PKI (allowing issuance for subdomains after validating a registered domain), so it's good to have clear semantics in ACME for it. --Richard On Thu, Oct 14, 20

Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption

2021-10-15 Thread Owen Friel (ofriel)
Not sure why "domainNamespace" is used as the field when "subdomains" is shorter and easier to understand. [ofriel] there was early discussion on the mailer about what exactly a 'subdomain' meant. So we quoted the CA/B Browser baseline definitions and used that terminology instead. Note tha