Thanks for the e-mail Corey!
> On 12 May 2023, at 15:35, Corey Bonnell wrote:
>
> > ACME Clients need to calculate the correct label. Although we provide the
> > algorithm, a bash script, and test vectors, anecdotal data from ISRG
> > suggest that some clients still mess things up
I'm also in favour of calling it DNS-02. I highly doubt there will be many
(if any) versions of challenges beyond version 1. It makes more sense to me
to read DNS-02 and DNS challenge type 2, not a upgraded edition of version
1.
--
Any statements contained in this
For what it's worth, I'm in favor of calling it DNS-02. Despite your
totally correct descriptions of the disadvantages of this new method, I
*do* still view it as a generally-improved version of DNS-01. It's
obviously backwards-incompatible, hence the new major version number, but
it is generally
Hi Antonios,
Thanks for raising this draft again, especially since automation of domain
validation currently is an active topic at the CA/B Forum validation
sub-committee. Comments inline.
> There was a suggestion to rename this challenge to DNS-02. This is something
> that we had rejected
> On 12 May 2023, at 03:30, Melinda Shore wrote:
>
> On 5/11/23 3:52 PM, Antonios Chariton wrote:
>> What do you think about the naming? Do you perceive “DNS-02” as an improved
>> version, or as a second option? We are happy to rename this to DNS-02 and we
>> have no plans of breaking any
