Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-24 Thread Tim Hollebeek
anyone interested in discussing this issue there to do so. -Tim From: Acme On Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 9:02 PM To: Ben Kaduk Cc: Ryan Sleevi ; Salz, Rich ; ke...@iseclab.org; IETF ACME ; Tobias Fiebig Subject: Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-22 Thread Salz, Rich
: Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 6:48 PM Benjamin Kaduk mailto:ka...@mit.edu>> wrote: On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 05:25:40PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > * It does not seem to be related to ACME - that is, what you’re > describing is more broadly a

Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-21 Thread Ryan Sleevi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 6:48 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 05:25:40PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > > * It does not seem to be related to ACME - that is, what you’re > describing is more broadly a set of concerns with the methods that may be > used to validate a domain. > >

Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 05:25:40PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > * It does not seem to be related to ACME - that is, what you’re > describing is more broadly a set of concerns with the methods that may be > used to validate a domain. > > Perhaps ACME isn’t the right place for this, perhaps it s

Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-21 Thread Salz, Rich
* It does not seem to be related to ACME - that is, what you’re describing is more broadly a set of concerns with the methods that may be used to validate a domain. Perhaps ACME isn’t the right place for this, perhaps it should be reviewed by SecDispatch, or whatever the DNS equivalent is,

Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-21 Thread Ilari Liusvaara
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:37:18AM +, Tobias Fiebig wrote: > Dear all, > At the IETF in Montreal, I presented findings on security issues with > domain validation in ACME, and were encouraged to write a short draft > outlining attacks and possible defenses. We now created a first > draft, which

Re: [Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-21 Thread Ryan Sleevi
Thanks for posting this. It does not seem to be related to ACME - that is, what you’re describing is more broadly a set of concerns with the methods that may be used to validate a domain. For example, ACME is a strict, well-defined subset of that which permitted by the CA/Browser Forum’s Baseline

[Acme] ACME DV Security Considerations Draft

2018-10-21 Thread Tobias Fiebig
Dear all, At the IETF in Montreal, I presented findings on security issues with domain validation in ACME, and were encouraged to write a short draft outlining attacks and possible defenses. We now created a first draft, which outlines the general structure and contents we are aiming for, see h