issue.
From: Amir Omidi
Sent: Friday, 10 November 2023 10:46:03 PM
To: Tim Hollebeek
Cc: Aaron Gable; My1; Q Misell; Wang Haiguang; acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
I agree. Reading this I’m not entirely sure what problems it’s trying to solve.
On Fri, Nov 10,
gt; solve. Otherwise this discussion will just go in circles.
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Acme *On Behalf Of *Wang Haiguang
> *Sent:* Friday, November 10, 2023 2:42 PM
> *To:* Q Misell
> *Cc:* My1 ; Aaron Gable ;
> acme@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Acme] Decentr
PM
To: Q Misell
Cc: My1 ; Aaron Gable ;
acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
Hi, Q
Very sorry that I have no experience in CA operation. Could you please give us
an example that one person saying something and result in certificate
revocation?
Based on my
PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: My1; Aaron Gable; acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
You've missed the point entirely. Under no circumstances should agreement be
required to revoke a certificate, there are numerous cases where one person and
one person alone saying something
t; *Cc:* Q Misell; Aaron Gable; acme@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
>
> revocation time SERIOUSLY isnt something that should be up to the
> certificate owner, it needs to just work, be fast and not need some
> "consensus voting". just a proof that it&
.
From: My1
Sent: Friday, 10 November 2023 7:02 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: Q Misell; Aaron Gable; acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
revocation time SERIOUSLY isnt something that should be up to the certificate
owner, it needs to just work, be
tial of ACME.
>
>
> Have nice day.
>
>
> Haiguang
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Q Misell
> *Sent:* Thursday, 9 November 2023 6:48:04 PM
> *To:* Wang Haiguang
> *Cc:* Aaron Gable; acme@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Acme] Decentrali
] Decentralized the ACME
> There are many different blockchains today and some of them quite cheap in
> transaction fees. These blockchain with cheap transaction fees support smart
> contract too. Beside that, we can also consider consortium blockchains, which
> can have fewer nodes and
nge
> first.
>
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> Haiguang
> ----------
> *From:* Wang Haiguang
> *Sent:* Thursday, 9 November 2023 7:23:52 AM
> *To:* Aaron Gable
> *Cc:* acme@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
>
>
> Hi,
regards.
Haiguang
From: Wang Haiguang
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2023 7:23:52 AM
To: Aaron Gable
Cc: acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
Hi, Aron
Thanks very much for your comments.
We have also considered the cost of issuing certific
From: Aaron Gable
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2023 1:39:05 AM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
Hi Wang,
Thanks for your interest in ACME, and for sharing this paper with us.
Unfortunately, I think the ideas presented in the paper are undesirable for
Hi Wang,
Thanks for your interest in ACME, and for sharing this paper with us.
Unfortunately, I think the ideas presented in the paper are undesirable for
most website operators, concerning from an implementation perspective, and
significantly exceed the scope of this working group.
First and mo
On 11/8/23 7:52 AM, Wang Haiguang wrote:
I agree with you that decentralizing the ACME might be a topic too large
and exceed the scope of the ACME working group. However, considering
that the transparency of CA management is vital important for the future
internet. It might be worthy to thinki
.
From: Q Misell
Sent: Wednesday, 8 November 2023 10:52:23 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: Q Misell; acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
Whilst I agree that CAs could do with more transparency, ACME isn't the place
to work on that.
ACME is one of many me
Whilst I agree that CAs could do with more transparency, ACME isn't the
place to work on that.
ACME is one of many methods to interact with a CA, most CAs don't even
offer it.
It is merely a protocol interface to a CA, the CA/BF actually defines how a
CA operates, and any transparency requirements
Sent: Wednesday, 8 November 2023 10:14:43 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: acme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Acme] Decentralized the ACME
Hi Haiguang,
Thanks for your email and the interest in ACME.
Personally I don't think the blockchain has much - if any - place in ACME.
CAs are already pretty decentra
Hi Haiguang,
Thanks for your email and the interest in ACME.
Personally I don't think the blockchain has much - if any - place in ACME.
CAs are already pretty decentralised, and you're already perfectly
capable of choosing whatever CA you want for the job (within certain
commercial and policy res
Hello, everyone
My name is Haiguang Wang from Huawei.
I am interested in the networking and security protocols research. I have
attended IETF meeting since year 2017 and have followed the work in ACME group
for sometime.
Last year we have come across a research paper "A Blockchain-based Me
18 matches
Mail list logo
