VERYONE. Stop merging. Discuss on the list.
>
>
>
> *From: *Richard Barnes
> *Date: *Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:38 PM
> *To: *"acme@ietf.org"
> *Subject: *[Acme] Randomizing URLs in examples
>
>
>
> I have opened a PR reverting Jacob's reve
The fact that there were open concerns does not mean that PR455 was wrong.
Please undo the revert that was part of PR458.
EVERYONE. Stop merging. Discuss on the list.
From: Richard Barnes
Date: Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:38 PM
To: "acme@ietf.org"
Subject: [Acme] Randomizi
I have opened a PR reverting Jacob's reversion of the #455
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/460
The randomization of examples is independent of whether you think GETs are
a good idea or not. As noted in the Security Considerations, having
different types of resources in different namesp
