Re: [Acme] WGLC for ACME Integrations

2021-05-03 Thread Salz, Rich
Speaking as an individual, I read the doc. It’s a good starting point. I think the authors should go to the “other” working groups and get them to drum up support over in ACME for their doc. I think ACME is going to have a problem handling not-widely-applicable things like this. I don’t have

Re: [Acme] WGLC for ACME Integrations

2021-04-30 Thread Yoav Nir
Nearly a month has passed, and no responses. None at all. Unless we get some reviews, I can’t declare a working group consensus on this. We need at least some “I’ve read it; I believe it’s useful and I think it’s ready for publication” reviews. Without them, I think the best plan would be to

[Acme] WGLC for ACME Integrations

2021-03-31 Thread Yoav Nir
Hi. This starts a WGLC for the subject draft entitled “ACME Integrations. The call will end at EOD Monday, April 19th, 2001. The document has been with the WG since last January, and has received some review. Following the closing of the last two issues, the authors believe and the sense of