[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 23:52 --- I found an additional system which fails, an Intel STL2 -- an old Dual PIII with a serverworks chipset that does this: ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are rece

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 15:46 --- OK, good, I tested the patch and it seems working, now /proc/interrupts shows the same as in 2.6.18.3, except for irq 21 and 22 which are swapped (the device are swapped

[Bug 146816] Dell D600 (w/ Radeon) acpi suspend doesn't restart

2006-12-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Dell D600 (w/ Radeon) acpi suspend doesn't restart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=146816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Rem

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 15:30 --- I'm also going to try the patch ASAP. BTW, sorry for the double post of lspci, I mess up something... --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on th

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 15:26 --- Created an attachment (id=9714) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9714&action=view) acpidump with kernel 2.6.19 and irqpoll --- You are receiving

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 15:26 --- Created an attachment (id=9713) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9713&action=view) lspci -vv kernel 2.6.19 with irqpoll --- You are receiving thi

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 15:25 --- Created an attachment (id=9712) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9712&action=view) lspci -vv kernel 2.6.19 with irqpoll --- You are receiving thi

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 11:09 --- Created an attachment (id=9711) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9711&action=view) /proc/interrupts after reverting SCI patch in 2.6.19 The contents o

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 11:08 --- Created an attachment (id=9710) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9710&action=view) dmesg after reverting the SCI patch in 2.6.19 Things look good. You

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 10:50 --- Created an attachment (id=9709) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9709&action=view) 2.6.18+2.6.19 info I've made I lil' archive with all you've asked.

[Bug 7601] irq 18: nobody cared

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 10:14 --- Created an attachment (id=9708) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9708&action=view) SCI patch in 2.6.19 Please try reverting this patch from your 2.6.1

[Bug 7465] w/ ACPI shows only 1 cpu core. Machine has 2 cores and without ACPI, it shows both of them.

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7465 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 10:05 --- The fan was working "hard" because I didnt set up the correct scaling governor. But I was able just to setup the scaling governor for cpu0 and not for cpu1. Was that exp

[Bug 7465] w/ ACPI shows only 1 cpu core. Machine has 2 cores and without ACPI, it shows both of them.

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7465 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 09:45 --- Created an attachment (id=9707) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9707&action=view) Dmesg using the second patch Now it worked! I'm using ACPI and both

[Bug 7465] w/ ACPI shows only 1 cpu core. Machine has 2 cores and without ACPI, it shows both of them.

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7465 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9702 is|0 |1 obsolete|

Re: [Bug 43961] Re: Power down after shutdown does not work...

2006-12-01 Thread Mark
Yes, me too (Centrino but single core) and also the problem with Edgy. I've compiled a new kernel and then it can shutdown and reboot. I think, it has something to do with the kernel. 2.6.17-10-generic. By the way, I've used suspend2 in the newer kernel. I think, it will be solved in the next rele

[Bug 43961] Re: Power down after shutdown does not work...

2006-12-01 Thread WillyWongi
I have a CentrinoDuo laptop (ICH7) from PackardBell and it won't power off anymore since Edgy upgrade; can't tell if it happened within a kernel upgrade; as all the others my system stop functioning with the text "Will now halt" and simply... won't halt! Ubuntu Edgy; kernel 2.6.17-10-generic fglrx

[Bug 7465] w/ ACPI shows only 1 cpu core. Machine has 2 cores and without ACPI, it shows both of them.

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7465 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9636 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 7465] w/ ACPI shows only 1 cpu core. Machine has 2 cores and without ACPI, it shows both of them.

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7465 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9636 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 7465] w/ ACPI shows only 1 cpu core. Machine has 2 cores and without ACPI, it shows both of them.

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7465 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 03:31 --- Created an attachment (id=9703) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9703&action=view) Dmesg with patch dmesg with patch --- You are receiving this m

[Bug 7465] w/ ACPI shows only 1 cpu core. Machine has 2 cores and without ACPI, it shows both of them.

2006-12-01 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7465 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-01 01:27 --- Created an attachment (id=9702) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9702&action=view) workaround to parse the second MADT This is a workaround to make yo