[Bug 8278] boot hang unless "acpi=off" - asus M3000N

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8278 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|boot hang unless "acpi=off" |boot hang unless "acpi=off"

[Bug 8288] acpi logs flood by "processor CPU1" events

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8288 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- |

[Bug 6419] VIA: irq 201: nobody cared on ethernet via_rhine - VIA PT894/VT8237 and Fast clock issues and Lost timer tick(s)!

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|CODE_FIX

[Bug 7985] 2.4 -> 2.6 regression - Kernel panic - not syncing: fatal exception in interrupt - ASUS A7V8X

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7985 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Summary|2.4 -> 2.6 r

[Bug 8295] LCD always max brightness after unlocking X - ThinkPad R52

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8295 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- |

[Bug 8186] x86_64-only: system hang starting X unless "acpi=noirq" - HP dv9000

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8186 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-02 21:37 --- Is cpufreq running? What are the contents of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/*? What if you disable cpufreq with CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n? --- You are receiving this

[Bug 8186] x86_64-only: system hang starting X unless "acpi=noirq" - HP dv9000

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8186 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-02 21:32 --- > I have also tried 2.6.21-rc5 and it still fails the same way. Previously the default was nmi_watchdog=2 and you said you got a (different) boot hang with nmi_watchd

[Bug 8274] kacpi use up 100% CPU - Sony PCG-XR1G

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8274 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-02 20:48 --- Could you attach your kernel config file and the output of #cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/* #cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/ATF0/* when CPU is busy? --- You are receiv

[Bug 6419] VIA: irq 201: nobody cared on ethernet via_rhine - VIA PT894/VT8237 and Fast clock issues and Lost timer tick(s)!

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-02 17:04 --- hum, I just use/test x86_64 arch on this computer and your patch is for i386 message says : The same code was already removed from x86_64 btw I hadn't test your patch y

[Bug 6419] VIA: irq 201: nobody cared on ethernet via_rhine - VIA PT894/VT8237 and Fast clock issues and Lost timer tick(s)!

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-02 16:55 --- Hi , I test fedora kernel 2.6.20-1.3036 which is based on 2.6.21-rc5-git4 and looks good : cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource acpi_pm

[Bug 8278] boot hang unless "acpi=off" - Asus M2400N

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8278 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-02 10:11 --- I have problem with kernel 2.6.20 also with compiled source from Ubuntu repository (its not my fault, quite sure, I've compiled kernel for Gentoo many times). I don't

[Bug 7110] No handler or method for GPE[ 0], disabling event - HP XW6200

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are rece

[Bug 7110] No handler or method for GPE[ 0], disabling event - HP XW6200

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-02 08:23 --- Created an attachment (id=11024) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=11024&action=view) dmesg running a 2.6.20.4 kernel Here is a dmesg running a 2.6.20.