http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5044
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 00:20 ---
Just so you know, I have noticed your patch. I just haven't had time to compile
my own kernel and test it yet.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9717
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 00:49 ---
First of all, thanks for working on this!
(In reply to comment #5)
oops, this is an AMD box.
rather than acpi-cpufreq, please try to load powernow-k7 or powernow-k8.
In
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9717
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 00:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=14410)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14410action=view)
Output of dmesg on my machine where cpufreq fails, kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 02:14 ---
I only rty to use linux debian with recompiled kernels, which has been taken
rfom official kernel site.
I try 2.6.[22,23,24-rc[6,7]] and in all them I watch this bug.
All other
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 03:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=14412)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14412action=view)
dmesg, lspci, dmidecode outputs
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 03:02 ---
My kernel version is 2.6.23.9
I am attaching the requested outputs + additional
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #65 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 03:02 ---
At least I as a user not familiar at all with Windows (actually, my machine
came with Vista 32bits) need a guide on what to do and how to undo it (I do not
want to void the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 03:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=14411)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14411action=view)
My kernel config
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #66 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 03:34 ---
Hernan,
(In reply to comment #65)
At least I as a user not familiar at all with Windows (actually, my machine
came with Vista 32bits) need a guide on what to do and how to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|m
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017#c9
Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |high
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 07:40 ---
Not sure, depends on when the changes below were integrated into Linux.
Problem was introduced here:
12 September 2006. Summary of changes for version 20060912:
Enhanced the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
Summary: No ACPI battery info
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.24-rc7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 07:50 ---
I'd almost say to heck with trying to optimize a 3-byte IRQ descriptor to the
2-byte version and always output the 3-byte version. This would actually
*remove* some ACPICA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #67 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 07:44 ---
Lin Ming is investigating this issue and attempting to determine the exact
windows behavior.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8855
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 09:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=14415)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14415action=view)
Output of lspci -nn from HP nx6325
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 08:14 ---
Tibor,
I used to face the same problem switching from 2.6.23 to 2.6.24
But that time I didn't enable these deprecated things:
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 09:08 ---
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y
As it can be seen in the problem description above these options are set.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 11:12 ---
OK I`l try.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 11:07 ---
The following info helps perhaps:
I inserted some printk calls in drivers/acpi/battery.c so I could
recognize that:
acpi_battery_init is called and executed normally, returnes
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 10:28 ---
Mihail,
Please try -rc7 with patch from bug #9627.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9731
Summary: 2.6.24-rc7: Deadlock when any ACPI eject sys node
written
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.24-rc7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 10:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=14416)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14416action=view)
The result of acpidump
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 11:56 ---
I don't think that is what Windows does since bug 6316 was caused by a device
that couldn't deal with an unoptimized IRQ descriptor.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 12:16 ---
This is more than weird... Now I got it inside VirtualBox while testing new
KDE-4 liveCD.
kernel: 2.22.13
msg was (transcript):
atkbd.c: Spurious NAK on isa0060/serio0.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017#c10
Robert Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9731
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 12:38 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:38:25 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9731
Summary:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 13:13 ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
On Friday, 11 of January 2008, supersud501 wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:03:00 -0800
Andrew
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 13:14 ---
What we seem to be saying here is that there is some requirement that the _SRS
buffer be the exact same size as the _CRS buffer, at least on some systems. The
ACPI spec only
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocking|low
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 12:18 ---
So I have rtied patch from bug #9627 with .24-rc7 -- so we returned to the bug
#9663
We have got fully working /sys but fukky bloked fn keys that even hasn`t
generated
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 11:14 ---
I see some suspicious line in boot.msg, there is something amout BAT0:
6ACPI: Interpreter enabled
6ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5)
6ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
4ACPI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|high|blocking
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 12:06 ---
I know it is kinda weird but it's not happening anymore. No msg in dmesg, no
stucked keys. Daniele, others, are you still facing this bug?
Linux assam 2.6.23-gentoo-r3 #1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9627
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9663
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9627
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 14:29 ---
*** Bug 9663 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 14:45 ---
So I`m sorry for grammar in my messages.
About toshoba.c I can say that this driver isn`t support toshiba laptops with
phoenix bios. More of all last laptops came with this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|low |blocking
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|7216|
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:13 ---
_INI presence check works in exactly opposite way, -ENODEV is returned if it is
not present, which is true on your machine (it does not have any _INI methods
depending on EC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:22 ---
Yes I tried.
fn keys doesn`t work in that case.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:27 ---
Please try to disable ACPI/video in .config
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:30 ---
I will try to do it now...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:47 ---
You might also want to experiment with calls to _DOS in drivers/acpi/video.c
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:56 ---
From Phoenix:
The original PNP spec stated that the exact format of _CRS must be matched
with the subsequent _SRS
So, the patch above seems to be moving in the right
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 16:40 ---
The sequence of execution and params in functions in video.c are the same in
both cases - when _INI disabled and when _INI enabled. But results aren`t the
same :(
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3358
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 19:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=14424)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14424action=view)
patch vs 2.6.24 to fix autoload
Yakui,
Please update the patch in comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9731
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
57 matches
Mail list logo
