http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #97 from len.br...@intel.com 2009-02-21 09:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=20321)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20321&action=view)
2.6.27's 320eee refreshed to apply to 2.6.26.stable
It is sort of late
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #96 from venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com 2009-02-04 14:31 ---
Yes. 320eee OK to go to stable.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #95 from len.br...@intel.com 2009-02-02 20:04 ---
venki,
should we send 320eee776357db52d6fcfb11cff985b1976a4595
to 2.6.26.stable?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are r
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
d...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||venkatesh.pallip...@intel.co
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #92 from dennis.jan...@web.de 2008-12-26 13:11 ---
pps. ykzhaos patch fixed both problems for me: the high wakes were gone and the
cpu could use all C-modes and did use the right one.
commit 320eee "just" fixed (only) the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #91 from dennis.jan...@web.de 2008-12-26 13:03 ---
ps. The C2 mode still doesnt work of course.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #90 from dennis.jan...@web.de 2008-12-26 13:02 ---
Okay. The bad guy is
commit 320eee...
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=320eee776357db52d6fcfb11cff985b1976a4595
please add m
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #89 from d...@gmx.net 2008-12-26 10:48 ---
git bisect complains because the good version is newer than the bad version. I
will try exchanging good and bad:
git bisect start 2.6.27-rc5 2.6.27-rc1 does not work
git bisect star
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #88 fro
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #87 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-28 02:09 ---
(In reply to comment #86)
> hmmm, so the workaround didn't work because the problem
> had already vanished in linux-2.6.26.
Yes. The one problem (high wakes) had disappeared,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #86 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 19:28 ---
hmmm, so the workaround didn't work because the problem
had already vanished in linux-2.6.26.
Yes, that is both good news and bad.
Good for 2.6.27 users.
Bad for 2.6.26 users..
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #85 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 01:45 ---
It looks like the bug is not reproducible in 2.6.27. No more 40.000 wake/s even
if I disable the workaround. It just stays in C1 while idle:
CnAvg residency
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #84 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-18 08:02 ---
I didn't really deactivate the workaround, I'll have to test it again...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #83 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-18 07:09 ---
The patch in #81 with workaround 1 from #82 also works. The C3 state is
available and used, just like with 2.6.27-vanilla as far as I can see.
I will keep using it for now to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #82 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 14:26 ---
oh, to perform the test in commetn #81 using 2.6.27,
you'll need to disable the DMI workaround.
you can do that by commenting out this call in
acpi_processor_init():
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #81 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 14:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=18357)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18357&action=view)
test patch vs linux-2.6.27
please apply this patch to linux-2.6.27
and b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #80 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 11:05 ---
You're very welcome, if there's *anything* else I can do to help, please let me
know.
(In case someone really wants to hack this: These notebooks are quite cheap(but
good), s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|powertop - 4+ wakes per |4 wake/s unless
21 matches
Mail list logo
