http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-08 13:27 ---
To be quite sure, that the problem really is gone, I made today additional
test, compiling the newest kernel within the older environment (Debian Etch),
and made the test using
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 07:22 ---
Today I've compiled newest 2.6.27.8 kernel with no additional ACPI-related
patches, but there wasn't any need to test "idle=poll" neither "idle=halt",
because... the problem co
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 07:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=19195)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19195&action=view)
Dmesg made on 2008-12-07
Dmesg made on 2008-12-07, Gobolinux, kernel 2.6
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 07:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=19194)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19194&action=view)
ACPI dump of GA-6BX7 made on 2008-12-07
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #21 from [
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Component|Other
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 14:09 ---
Yes, tried it today with kernel 2.6.27.5 - and it seems to fix the problem.
Thanks! :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-04 22:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=18682)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18682&action=view)
patch: disable c state on old cpus
please try this patch.
--
Configur
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-10 00:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=17709)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17709&action=view)
dmidecode's output (my current hardware)
dmidecode's output attached
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-10 00:10 ---
active state:C0
max_cstate: C1
bus master activity:
maximum allowed latency: 20 usec
states:
C1: type[C1] pro
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 16:56 ---
Today I made another try compiling just kernel alone (without any modules),
with configuration having "processor" built-in. With that ACPI-module compiled
"for steady" into the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 02:43 ---
1) It's not possible to remove processor module (each time "ERROR: Module
processor is in use").
2) I cannot compile kernel just to change this one & only option - it takes 5
h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 01:35 ---
If the processor is compiled as module, please remove the processor module
manually and install the processor module manually.In such case the module
parameter of "max_cstate=1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 01:13 ---
No, it doesn't, because:
1) I've got "processor" as a module, and because of this
"processor.max_cstate=1" is ignored as a boot parameter.
2) Adding into /etc/modprobe.d/opti
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-01 18:47 ---
does boot parameter "processor.max_cstate=1" help?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-23 06:43 ---
I forgot to add, that after finishing the test under 2.6.26.2 I had mentioned
earlier problem with no passing by "Asking all remaining processes to
terminate" (when shutting the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-23 06:24 ---
Maybe "vmstat" output will give you a clue? I tried to take its output to a
file (vmstat 1 10 > file.txt), while reloading that "bloated" web page.
1. Output from within 2.6.26
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-22 13:48 ---
It's rather impossible (because of the "throttling" of io, as I wrote already).
I tried to, anyway - but pay attention, that in fact it has been done really
AFTER the problem ha
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
23 matches
Mail list logo
