http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #66 from l
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #65 from len.br...@intel.com 2009-01-16 11:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=19835)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19835&action=view)
patch vs 2.6.29-rc1
refreshed patch applied to acpi tree
--
Configu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
astarikovs...@suse.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #63 from shu...@gwu.edu 2008-12-16 01:01 ---
Yes, this patch does solve the problem (at least, for 2.6.27.7). Amazing!
Do I understand correctly that the bug in ec.c was that despite the comment
"We really need to limit this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #62 from astarikovs...@suse.de 2008-12-15 09:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=19310)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19310&action=view)
limit workarounds for ASUS
Please check if this patch works without
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #61 from ming.m@intel.com 2008-12-11 19:48 ---
void __init acpi_early_init(void)
.
status = acpi_ec_ecdt_probe();
/* Ignore result. Not having an ECDT is not fatal. */
status = ac
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #60 from ming.m@intel.com 2008-12-11 18:37 ---
(In reply to comment #58)
> So what should be the "right solution" then? Patch DSDT? Disable BIOS option?
> Bug HP to fix their BIOS?
As Bob mentioned at #53,
"The real fi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #59 from shu...@gwu.edu 2008-12-11 17:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=19258)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19258&action=view)
dmesg of the 2.6.27.7 kernel with patches from #44 and #52 applied, custom D
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #58 from shu...@gwu.edu 2008-12-11 17:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=19257)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19257&action=view)
dmesg of the 2.6.27.4 kernel with patches from #44 and #52 applied, custom D
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-11 01:44 ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> Concerning the "quick workaround", where in my DSDT.dsl file do
> I have to add this line? Sorry, I'm just afraid to mess things up.
Apply below pa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 23:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=19246)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19246&action=view)
dmesg of the 2.6.27.4 kernel with patches from #44 and #52 applied and wi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 23:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19245)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19245&action=view)
dmesg of the 2.6.27.4 kernel with patches from #44 and #52 applied and wi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 18:05 ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> A quick workaround would be to statically initialize CUZO:
>
> Name (CUZO, Package (0x06) {0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF})
>
Alex, would you
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 13:14 ---
I believe what is happening here is that the CUZO Package object has not been
initialized and the DerefOf is failing because of this.
Looking at the DSDT, CUZO is initialized
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 02:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=19222)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19222&action=view)
debug patch
Store (DerefOf (Index (CUZO, 0x00)), Local0)
DerefOf Op pus
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-08 23:24 ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> Created an attachment (id=19133)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19133&action=view) [details]
> dmesg of the 2.6.27.4 kernel with
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-03 14:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=19134)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19134&action=view)
dmesg of the 2.6.27.4 kernel with patch from #44 applied and with the "fa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-03 14:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=19133)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19133&action=view)
dmesg of the 2.6.27.4 kernel with patch from #44 applied and with the "fa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 23:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=19119)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19119&action=view)
dmesg of the 2.6.27.7 kernel with patch from #44 applied and with the "fa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 23:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=19118)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19118&action=view)
dmesg of the vanilla 2.6.27.7 kernel with the "fan while AC is on" BIOS o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-01 22:53 ---
> I will have a go at them tomorrow. Which kernel do I have
> to apply them to, by the way? 2.6.27.7?
2.6.27.7 is OK
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-01 17:32 ---
Yakui and Lin,
I didn't have a chance to try your patches yet. Sorry.
I will have a go at them tomorrow. Which kernel do I have
to apply them to, by the way? 2.6.27.7?
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-01 00:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19087)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19087&action=view)
debug patch to find out where PSWT fails
>ACPI Error (dswstate-0097): Re
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 00:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=19029)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19029&action=view)
patch: Remove EC space handler explicitly when failing in _REG object
Wi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Power-Battery |EC
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 23:52 ---
It seems that this issue is related with EC.
>From the acpidump we can know that there exists the error in evaluating the
_REG object of EC device, which causes that the EC dev
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #40 from [
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|acpi-
|
29 matches
Mail list logo
