https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Len Brown l...@kernel.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flor...@mickler.org
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #39 from Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org 2012-10-15 21:28:41
---
A patch referencing this bug report has been merged in Linux v3.7-rc1:
commit 67bfa9b60bd689601554526d144b21d529f78a09
Author: Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Len Brown l...@kernel.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #35 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-09-28 07:17:39 ---
ok, I've tested the new kernel with patch 30 and 34, without any extra kernel
command line at boot up.
The acpi seems working correctly, all acpi event are detected
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #36 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-09-28 07:20:24 ---
Many thanks for test. Francesco.
I'll submit the 2 patches soon.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #32 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-09-25 03:22:16 ---
Francesco,
Could you run sudo dmidecode on your machine, and post the output here. We'd
like to make a patch to change the threshold for your laptop based on
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #31 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-09-17 20:21:56 ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Thanks for the test, when you tried the patch, did you also add
acpi.ec_irq_force=1 in the kernel cmdline as in comment 27.
No, I in test
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #28 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-09-11 19:30:37 ---
No, I've check twice but the patch in comment #27 doesn't solve the issue, the
bug is still present.
Thanks,
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #29 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-09-12 02:47:54 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
No, I've check twice but the patch in comment #27 doesn't solve the issue, the
bug is still present.
Thanks for the test, when you tried
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #30 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-09-12 02:48:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=79881)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=79881)
make_threshold_parameter.patch
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #27 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-09-06 09:27:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=79351)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=79351)
adding ec_irq_force param
Glag to hear it fix the problem. But changing the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #25 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-09-05 11:36:00 ---
With the proposed patch in comment #24 the acpi event are come back to dead.
I've compiled twice kernel to be sure. On dmesg, there is no output.
Now I'm using the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #26 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-09-05 14:02:25 ---
Sorry for my confused English...
In the previous comment, I would mean that the patch fixes the bug.
Francesco
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #21 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-08-21 06:24:41 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Here it is the results but something strange happens. I've check three times
but I think I'm doing something wrong.
The strange behavior
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #22 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-21 13:00:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=78071)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=78071)
test of comment #21
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #24 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-08-21 15:44:57 ---
Yes, that's weird, Comment #1 should work while Comment #9 should not which
simply add some debug info.
There is something that is worse, now in all four test
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #16 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-20 15:09:30 ---
Here it is the results but something strange happens. I've check three times
but I think I'm doing something wrong.
The strange behavior is that adding the string
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #17 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-20 15:10:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=77981)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77981)
dmesg outputs of comment #13 (good?)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #18 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-20 15:10:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=77991)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77991)
dmesg outputs of comment #13 (bad?)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #19 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-20 15:10:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=78001)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=78001)
dmesg outputs of comment #14 (good?)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #20 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-20 15:11:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=78011)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=78011)
dmesg outputs of comment #14 (bad?)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #15 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-08-20 02:57:22 ---
Francesco,
Could you provide the debug info with the new debug method? I mean make the
changes suggested in Comment 13/14 and do the test and post the dmesg for both
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #13 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-08-13 06:48:55 ---
From the 2 dmesgs for bad/good situations, I can't find obvious clue. Could you
add these parameters to your kernel command line (by editing your
/boot/grub/grub.cfg)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #14 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-08-14 02:23:51 ---
Hi Francesco,
Since this bug is heavily bound with EC driver, especially when there is a GPE
storm warning in your dmesg. please apply this patch to your EC driver
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #10 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-12 11:13:29 ---
Ok, I've done both test. I've done the test as described in comment #4 and with
the patch requested in comment #7 and comment #9. The results are:
Comment #7 test:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #11 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-12 11:14:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=77431)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77431)
dmesg output of test proposed in comment #7
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #12 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-12 11:14:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=77441)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77441)
dmesg output of test proposed in comment #9
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #8 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-03 08:09:13 ---
What does you mean exactly?
Option A: from a virgen kernel source I apply _only the patch in comment #1
_and enable CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG in kernel config and do the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #9 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-08-03 08:36:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=76731)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=76731)
new gpe patch
Hi Francesco,
You already did a good job in testing kernel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #4 from Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com 2012-08-02 09:05:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=76651)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=76651)
gpe_debug.patch
Hi,
Could you try to build a kernel with this patch, and
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #5 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-02 21:09:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=76711)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=76711)
dmesg output when running kernel with gpe_debug.patch
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #6 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-08-02 21:11:48 ---
I did as you written. I press only the backlight down hotkey that use cause
an acpi event. The acpi listen output is:
video LCD 0087
Thanks for your
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Robert Moore robert.mo...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
--- Comment #3 from Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it 2012-07-31 20:49:37 ---
I've compiled the 3.2.21 kernel (the ubuntu precise kernel source) with and
without the proposed patch. The results is that applying the patch, thus
comment out the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Feng Tang feng.t...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||feng.t...@intel.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Len Brown l...@kernel.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Francesco trent...@dei.unipd.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151
Christopher M. Penalver christopher.penal...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
39 matches
Mail list logo
