On Thursday 11 April 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > update on this, i think i've tracked down 317460, seems to be fixed now.
> > kde:devel:ux is all rebuilding now, from tomorrow it should be possible
> > to test it on device
>
> Sounds great! I assume you mean 316158 (New files are not being i
On Thursday 11 April 2013 21:39:50 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > if there are objections on what it in the tag or what is missing that
> > > should really go in pa4, please let me know asap ;)
> >
> > I don't object to the branches merged, but I do
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > if there are objections on what it in the tag or what is missing that
> > should really go in pa4, please let me know asap ;)
>
> I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to the tagging
> unless these two bugs are fixed:
> h
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 05 April 2013, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > - slotFileCreated - This is called when a new file is created.
> > > - slotClosedAfterWrite - We don't track file modifications, we only
> > > track when files are opened with a write mode
On Friday 05 April 2013, Marco Martin wrote:
> > - slotFileCreated - This is called when a new file is created.
> > - slotClosedAfterWrite - We don't track file modifications, we only
> > track when files are opened with a write mode and then closed. So this
> > is the slot that should be called
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > is there somewhere i can hook into that tells me the exact moment it
> > notices a
> > file being added?
>
> nepomuk-core/services/filewatch/nepomukfilewatch.cpp
>
> - slotFileCreated - This is called when a new file is created.
> - slotClose
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> >
> > is there somewhere i can hook into that tells me the exact moment it
> > notices a
> > file being added?
>
> nepomuk-core/services/filewatch/nepomukfilewatch.cpp
>
> - slotFileCreated - This is called when a new file is created.
> - slotC
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > > > any particular requirements that we should pay attention?
> > > > atm nepomuk-core is 4.10.1, virtuoso is 6.1.6 and soprano is from 2
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > > any particular requirements that we should pay attention?
> > > atm nepomuk-core is 4.10.1, virtuoso is 6.1.6 and soprano is from 2.9
> > > branch,
> > > 20th march
> > > anything else im
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > any particular requirements that we should pay attention?
> > atm nepomuk-core is 4.10.1, virtuoso is 6.1.6 and soprano is from 2.9
> > branch,
> > 20th march
> > anything else important we should pay attention?
>
> Well, Nepomuk has some option
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 03 April 2013 18:10:55 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > > > I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to t
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 April 2013 18:10:55 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > > I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to the tagging
> > > > unless these two bugs are fixed:
> > > > http
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013 18:10:55 Marco Martin wrote:
>
> > > I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to the tagging
> > > unless these two bugs are fixed:
> > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317460
>
This seems lik
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > Plus, fileTypeUI could not be tested yet without the information being
> > > available in Nepomuk.
> >
> > shouldn't depend from something in the plasma-mobile repository(the one
> > being tagged).
>
> Ah yes, true. So the only thing is th
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 19:20:33 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to the tagging
> > unless these two bugs are fixed:
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317460
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 18:10:55 Marco Martin wrote:
> > I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to the tagging
> > unless these two bugs are fixed:
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317460
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316158
> >
> > Nepomuk-based media browsi
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to the tagging
> unless these two bugs are fixed:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317460
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316158
>
> Nepomuk-based media browsing is useless if
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 03.04.2013 17:40, Marco Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After the testing done to the integration branch done last days, i merged
> > into master the following branches:
> >
> > origin/rcg/imageviewer
> > origin/pa4/fileBrowser-fileTypeUI
On 03.04.2013 17:40, Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
After the testing done to the integration branch done last days, i merged into
master the following branches:
origin/rcg/imageviewer
origin/pa4/fileBrowser-fileTypeUI
origin/alarmsenginefixes
origin/oliverhenshaw/power-timeouts
origin/webkit23
or
Hi all,
After the testing done to the integration branch done last days, i merged into
master the following branches:
origin/rcg/imageviewer
origin/pa4/fileBrowser-fileTypeUI
origin/alarmsenginefixes
origin/oliverhenshaw/power-timeouts
origin/webkit23
origin/mbohlender/active.powerbutton
origin/
20 matches
Mail list logo
