Justin
Can you be a little more specific - which part do you need more information on?
The object(s) you are interested in are in a different domain to the DC to which you
have bound. The information is not available from (or via) this server. It is
possible to bind to a server in a
Oh really?
Can you show me any documented proof of that? Its not listed in any of the
cluster documentation that I've seen.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
Hi all ,
We have a test server we bought, we would like to test Windows 2000 AD
and E2K can one install these on the same machine (we a bit low on machines)
are there any issues?
P.s. are there any articles or links one can got to for motivating
moving from nt4 to win2k?
Thanks
Maybe he meant peanut clusters.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:41 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000
Oh really?
Can you show me any documented proof of that? Its not listed in any of
Hello Carlos,
If you are limited to putting everything on one machine (DC and EXC 2K) there's not
much I can offer you other than to say - do not install any unneeded add-ons.
There is a LOT going on on a Win2K Domain controller and a LOT going on a Ech2K box as
well.
If you become
Yes --- but i will tell you. If the desire to find articles on migration is to
convince higher-ups of the bnefits and ROI of migration, one of the first things I
would be sure they understood is that Microsoft will no longer provide support for Win
NT4.0 after Dec 31, 2003. That's HUGE if you
Chuck,
If you add the following to your query [and then write it to the screen] you
should get what you are looking for...
mail,legacyExchangeDN
r/Bill
-Original Message-
From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January
All,
I've held my tongue on this issue (NT 4.0 retirement as a justification) because I
think there is merit to it - but in a very negative and damaging way. There is
another way - using the same method, but turning it positive.
Executives NEVER like to be backed into a corner. And, to say
Perfect rebut Rick. I totally agree. Execs hate the idle threat and from my experience
they usually take it as a challenge. There are so many positives to point to when
selling the idea of Win2k/2003 that using the fact the you may lose (perceived)
support doesn't carry much weight. I do a lot
Sorry , I am relaying the information second hand because my programmer
withdrew from the group a while back and hasn't had a chance to sign back
up.
He wants to lookup and create or modify objects in child domains without
having to bind or hop servers.
-Original Message-
From: Tony
Title: Message
John,
FWIW,I have heard froma few "white
hats" that VNC is easy to hack because it stores passwords in known encryption
algorythms in the regsitry. http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/854/discussion
and http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/197477show
some more detail on this. I
Dear
about the 3) question I Installed 30 Cluster 2000 Sql Compaq Machine on
server that are not in AD (normal NT 4 Domain).
Later, for reorganization, I moved them in AD (domain 2000 trusted bidir
with the first) without publication without problems also for the users
(human and sw) that are
Continuing from Justin's Post:
Currently our intranet user management system is completely based on
LDAP and ADSI.
Our organization is now breaking up our initial server into a
parent/child domain structure. I will use PDC for the name of the domain
controller, DOMAIN for our DNS name and CHILD
Hi All,
I have the following errors occcurring between 2 sites (inter-site) between
2 domains (root and child).
Errors appear on the root DC (also a GC, and Preferred Bridgehead for
Site1).
In Site2, a preferred Bridgehead (also a GC) does not show errors.
Funny thing is only the
Go to HKLM/System/CCS/Services/NTDS/Diagnostics and set the Replication
Events value to 5. Then force replication. This will log all kinds of
replication info into the NTDS log that may help you to trouble shoot. I
don't have any references to the specific error off hand but thought
this may be
Continuing from Justin's Post:
Currently our intranet user management system is completely based on LDAP
and ADSI.
Our organization is now breaking up our initial server into a parent/child
domain structure. I will use PDC for the name of the domain controller,
DOMAIN for our DNS name and CHILD
Definitely not the whole issue but in you code at the bottom 'Users' is
not OU=Users it is CN=Users... Also, when you say PDC, I have to assume
you are talking about PDC emulator and not a PDC but if you are looking
at an NT DC make sure you test your code with WinNT:// as well as
LDAP:// You will
He does mean the PDC Emulator, all domains so far are in native mode.
-Original Message-
From: Sullivan, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Child Domain Programming.
Definitely not the
Title: Message
Warning: ADMT 2.0 from RC2 does not migrate
workstation profiles. I just got off a consulting job and tried to use
ADMT 2.0 and spent a while trying to figure out why the profiles werent
being updated.
I then installed ADMT 2.0 from RC1 and it
worked fine.
Warning #2:
All
I know this is not directly ADSI but you have to be
2000 savvy
to know ADSI well so here goes.
If a LAN user deletes a network folder , how can I
tell who deleted it?
If a LAN user deletes a network folder is there any
retrieval?
All help is appreciated!
Michael Penland
VIRUS
In order to determine who deletes a file you have
to enable file and folder access auditing in a policy and then configure the
files and folders that need to be audited. Once those requirements have been met
then you can determine who deleted the file by reviewing the security
log.
There
As a note, I tried using the WinNT provider.
When I used WinNT://CHILD or WinNT://CHILD.DOMAIN.COM
It returned a domain object, with only Schema availble as a lief node.
IE: WinNT://CHILD.DOMAIN.COM/Schema
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A.
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent:
So if it is set for everyone then will the security
log still reflect the user or machine?
MGP
- Original Message -
From:
Tim
Hines
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:20
PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Network Drive
Question
In order
23 matches
Mail list logo
