In a poorly pharsed response - I was assuming we (Victor) were aware of the AD Client.
I need to make sure I put complete thoughts down when I am responding in these forums
- - truly.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Zukerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:28
Hi Guys,
I am having a major problem in my organization over here. I have set up active
directory for about 800 users and about 500 workstations. But for some reasons or the
other my DNS seems to be misbehaving.
When I ping a host I get a reply from a particular IP address, but when I do a ping
Hi Guys,
I am having a major problem in my organization over here. I have set up active
directory for about 800 users and about 500 workstations. But for some reasons or the
other my DNS seems to be misbehaving.
When I ping a host I get a reply from a particular IP address, but when I do a ping
In Computers OU I could see only Windows nt/2000/xp computers but not
windows 95/98/me. How can I list the windows 95/98/me computers in this
OU?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 19:15
To: [EMAIL
I had the very same problem. It was affecting my scripts because I wasn't connecting
to the machines I thought I was.
* You need to enable DNS scavenging. Don't set anything below 48 hours.
* If you are using DHCP, add your DHCP servers to the DnsUpdateProxy group.
-Todd
-Original Messag
Thanks Todd,
But why do I need to add my DHCP Server to the DnsUpdateProxy group?
-Original Message-
From: Todd Povilaitis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Inconsistency
I had the very s
This is straight out of an excellent book on AD.
Inside Active Directory
A System Administrators Guide
ISBN 0-201-61621-1
[DnsUpdateProxy]
"...DHCP servers may dynamically register DNS resource records on behalf of DHCP
clients. In this case, the DHCP servers become the owners of those records.
Hi Rick,
Apologies for jumping into the middle of this thread, but I wanted to
clarify something.
Security descriptors use SIDs and GUIDs for two entirely different purposes.
The ACEs in an ACL _always_ use SIDs to identify the security principal
involved; they never use GUIDs to identify a secu
Warning rgd. the DnsUpdateProxy group: ..."by placing the computer objects
of the DHCP servers as members in this group, the servers won't become
record owners"...
=> that's exactly why you don't simply want to add the DHCP server's
computer account to this group, if this happens to be a DC. Otherw
And, absolutely correct this is. A DC in this group is a known security
problem.
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I need to check, but I believe that eDirectory uses GUIDs to represent
trustees (security principals), vs. SIDs in Windows. There are pluses and
minuses to both schemes, but none are particularly critical. I see it as
more of an implementation detail than anything else.
-gil
-Original Messag
Agreed. In our case we have separate domain member servers who's only task is to
provide DHCP services. They are not domain controllers.
-Original Message-
From: GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP-Germany,ex1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
We only allow secure updates. No down-level clients here.
-Original Message-
From: GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP-Germany,ex1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 12:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Computers OU
If you really want to see them in the same
Whoops, wrong thread, sorry...
-Original Message-
From: Todd Povilaitis
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 16:58
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Computers OU
We only allow secure updates. No down-level clients here.
-Original Message-
From: GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP
14 matches
Mail list logo
