Whats the definition of a 32 bit
OS? I only ask because Mark Russinovichs book says that Win95 contained
oodles of 16 bit code. So the absence of 16bit code isnt a requirement
for having a 32bit OS.
Cheers
Ken
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Win95 was a 32-bit OS, with a lot of 16-bit code for compatibility
reasons. There was a fairly significant 16--to-32-bit thunking layer.
It was not dependent on DOS in the way that WFW was dependent on DOS,
even though it contained more 16-bit code than its NT counterparts...
-ASB
FAST,
Admod will do it as well. No licensing questions if you are running W2K.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Renouf, Phil
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 11:50 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Command Line
Title: Investigating GC queries
First thing I would do is look at the DNS records for that
site. Is the GC you are concerned about listed in the records for that site? Are
there any records for the site?
If not, I would look at a network trace. This should be
pretty simple in terms of
Hey who is giving out free joeware hats. I want one! I did give out some
joeware thongs for Christmas this year. My g/f liked hers and she also
laughed that I gave one to her sister. I don't think her sister's husband
was appreciating it very much though. :o)
I looked at setting the POP3/IMAP
LOL with all of you.
Its Vancouver in March... Even DC in March was pushing it, March is Lousiana
or Florida or Arizona or Texas. Seriously though, I am pretty tied up with a
customer right now with fun issues with Exchange and third party tools where
I at the point of monitoring every change to
Rick: Excellent logical breakdown you old monkey
you.
Roger: I agree with you. Win9x was definitely somewhere
in the transition zone so thinking of it as 24 bit or a transitional OS makes
sense to me. It went so far as to havea differentthunking model for
32-16 available foruse due to how
Hi,
The best way to check this out is to activate detailed logging, reboot
logon and look at the log in:-
%windir%\Debug\UserMode\userenv.log.
We have written a free utility that will allow you to activate detailed
logging and will display the log in a meaningful way.
Yep - you can be sure that I'll be taking on a role of 'enforcer' ;o)
-rtk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 11:05 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] VERY VERY OT: DEC and
Justin -
I'm going to try again because, IMHO, you're working WAY too hard at this
one problem.
My current preference -
http://www.kewlit.com/whoami/index2b.html
Great for the Data Center boxes connected via KVM.
If you haven't looked at this tool - you have NO IDEA what you're missing.
If you haven't looked at this yet - you really NEED to. I have it
installed, working and am getting ready to toss X on, and get it
functioning.
This is one of those things that comes along and you look at it and think,
Huh that's really SUPER cool.
Check it out... it's worth the time.
Justin,
Havn't taken a look at Rick's suggestion WHOAMI but another alternative
is
BGINFO...http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/bginfo.shtml...It's
freeware and you can create a custom installation package...
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Rename My Computer to the computername
See
http://www.computerperformance.co.uk/Registry/registry_hacks_display_compute
rname.htm
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A.
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 19:41
To:
To delegate the permissions - yes
I would, however, consider removing authenticated users from the privilege
add workstations to domain in the DDC GPO
Greetz
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A.
Sent: Friday,
Dissecting surgical gloves on
Its Vancouver in March...
Yeah, so? Can't be much worse than MI in March.
I am pretty tied up with
Lame, so lame I'm tempted to not comment :) I am sure most presenters are in
the same boat. I am personally in that boat. I am not even sure HOW I will
get
I looked at it, and my eyes (almost) popped out. Is that really a 4.7Gig
distro, or am I hallucinating - again? :)
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow
DSMOVE or you could script it within a VB script
For DSMOVE
The same user can be moved from the Sales organization to the Marketing
organization with the following command:
dsmove cn=Jane Doe,ou=sales,dc=microsoft,dc=com
-newparent ou=Marketing,dc=microsoft,dc=com
Jorge
-Original
Hallucination. It's a 47MB compressed file system image... No where
near as imposing as it looks. It's in bytes - no Kbytes... ;-)
-rtk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 5:07 PM
To:
Actually, my malady is contagious :)
It's 4.7MB. I did not want to believe it would be that small when I first
look at it, that was why I was confused. But, from what I am reading, I can
see it's so small.
By the way, this does not appear to me to be any different from running LINUX
under a
19 matches
Mail list logo
