RE: [ActiveDir] script to convert userID to first and lastname of users

2005-02-18 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
This should work: strUserName = *INSERT NAME HERE* Set objConnection = CreateObject(ADODB.Connection) objConnection.Open Provider=ADsDSOObject; Set objCommand = CreateObject(ADODB.Command) objCommand.ActiveConnection = objConnection objCommand.CommandText = _

RE: [ActiveDir] Time sync on non-domain W2K server?

2005-02-18 Thread Ken Cornetet
There is a windows port of the standard NTP code available at http://www.five-ten-sg.com/ And http://norloff.org/ntp/ I used the former on many servers back in the nt4 days with no problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser

[ActiveDir] OT: Request for your perspective on ...

2005-02-18 Thread Dean Wells
Hi everyone, I was hoping I could get some of your input, I'm in need of a few other people's perspectives on a few products and was hoping some of you help me out. The topics I need another's perspective on are - * What you use the product for / its key features in your world? e.g.

RE: [ActiveDir] Updating ADM files - best practices

2005-02-18 Thread Ruston, Neil
Title: Message That made me chuckle - you advise that I give up the one setting which was the sole reason for posing the question :) I am not prepared to allow ADMs to be auto updated - this is too risky in a large, global environment. XP SP2 has just been released with its own new ADM files.

Re: [ActiveDir] Startup Scripts?

2005-02-18 Thread James_Day
Hi Devon What happens when you run that command from the command prompt on your local workstation. My first thought is temp1234 does not meet password complexity but I would need to know the results of the command from the command prompt first. I tried the command on my box and got the error

RE: [ActiveDir] Startup Scripts?

2005-02-18 Thread Harding, Devon
It works fine with that password. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:06 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Cc: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir]

[ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread Nathan Casey
Does anyone have a good doc on enabling the new 2003 SP1 Access Based Enumeration feature? List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread Paul van Geldrop
Enabling it will require you to compile a C function into a nice little command. I plan to do so this weekend, completely forgotten about it. This is one of the places that explains the process. Enjoy http://weblogs.asp.net/jhoward/archive/2005/02/11/371080.aspx Regards, Paul PS: If you examine

RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread James_Day
Return Receipt Your RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration document:

RE: [ActiveDir] Time sync on non-domain W2K server?

2005-02-18 Thread Free, Bob
We used xntpd on all our 4.0 domain controllers and had them at Stratum 2. It synched extremely well to our Stratum 1 systems and made it easy to see the hierarchy throughout the internal time network from either the W32 or *NIX boxes using the standard NTP stuff like ntpdate,ntpq, ntpdc, ntptrace

RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread Nathan Casey
So basically, for non programmers, Access Based Enumeration is not an option at this point [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/18/2005 9:05:37 AM Enabling it will require you to compile a C function into a nice little command. I plan to do so this weekend, completely forgotten about it. This is one of the

RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread Paul van Geldrop
That is correct. However, if I get the time to get this fixed this weekend, I'll be happy to share it with you for all your experimental fun. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Casey Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005

RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread Nathan Casey
That would be great..thanks. Being in the early stages of migrating from Novell, this feature is very important. It would be nice to at least test the feature without having to try a 3rd party solution like scriptlogics Cloak. Thanks nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/18/2005 1:12:45 PM That is

RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
you could also ask your friendly MS representative to contact the product group - they have a nice little tool available to enabled access based enumeration on tools. They're still thinking of putting a little UI option in the share-dialog to enable this (which would make sense), but unclear if

RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required

2005-02-18 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
Title: Message the "useless" feature of re-animating an object is meant to be used with other tools which are used to store that extra data which is missing in the tombstone. And that's exactly what these 3rd party tools do (now that it's supported with 2003). you could also choose to leave

RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration

2005-02-18 Thread nelson yong
Return Receipt Your document: RE: [ActiveDir] Access Based Enumeration was received by: nelson yong/IT/KSL at: 19/02/2005 09:22:08 AM

RE: [ActiveDir] W32Time and *nix

2005-02-18 Thread Roger Seielstad
You could also grab a copy of K9 and sync time with it Roger Seielstad E-mail Geek MS-MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:01 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org